Skip to main content

Is the most popular song at the Vatican these days "If I Had a Hammer?'

I don't know whether I'd go so far as to describe Pope Francis as "liberal." After all, he's held the line doctrinally on gay "marriage," abortion, women's ordination, and the other issues on which the world is trying to get the Church to kowtow to its values. This pontiff strikes me, if the truth be told, as 1) personally holy; 2) spiritually sound; 3) politically naïve; and 4) an utter disaster at public relations.

But-not surprisingly- a great many in the Vatican and in the Roman church as a whole are upset by the impression the pope is giving of a willingness to sell out when it comes to matters on which the values of Christianity and those of the secular world collide.

While I'm a Lutheran rather than a Roman Catholic, this matter lies close to the heart of "culture war" in which all believers (as well as ethical people who are not believers) are vitally involved. If the teachings of Christianity (and, for that matter, the customs and institutions and received wisdom of millennia of Western civilization and culture) are merely arbitrary human constructs, which can be changed as society changes, then the Church might as well go out of business. It has nothing to say worth listening to, nothing to contribute, and no reason to exist.

The premise which justifies the very existence of the Church is the notion that it speaks an unchanging Word from God to an essentially unchanging human condition. Christian ethics- and the ethics of the ages- have to do with things hard-wired into human nature. Mores have changed a great deal in the past two thousand years; human nature has not. Human beings remain sinners, turned inward on themselves and at odds with each other and with their Creator. The remedy remains repentance and forgiveness through faith in the atoning life and death of Jesus Christ, mediated through the Word and the Sacraments.

That which violated God's intention for humanity in St. Paul's day continues to violate it today. The world- and particularly the secular Left- needs to get over the idea that divine revelation changes. The values of society do indeed change. But God does not- and neither does His truth.

When I was in the parish I couldn't help but notice that the attitude of not only my congregations but of the Church at large seemed to be that somehow the world had things- attendance at worship, popularity, money- that we somehow needed, and that our position needed to be that of salesmen or supplicants. Such an attitude is death to the Church and to any possibility of its relevance to the human race.

The entire premise of the Church's existence is that we have something that the world needs- and that its need for what we have is a matter of life and death.

Until we become convinced of that, we are as useless to the world as we are to God. And only when we become convinced of that again will be act like we actually believe this stuff we talk about in church on Sunday mornings.

HT: Drudge


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…