Skip to main content



In its understandable and commendable desire to stop Donald Trump, National Review has endorsed Ted Cruz.

Cruz, like Donald Trump, is unelectable. He has never to my knowledge renounced his Dominionist heritage or his father's claim that he is one of God's anointed "End Time Kings" ordained to "redistribute the wealth."

Making Leviticus American civil law? Redistributing the wealth? These are not hallmarks of a conservative of any kind, and especially a Constitutional conservative. Cruz needs to address these things.

But beyond that, he simply doesn't play well with others. He is cordially despised by his fellow members of the Republican Senate caucus, and his inflexibility does not bode well for his dealings with the leaders of other nations. And his "shut down the government" crusade, as well the spectacle of his personal and rather a bizarre filibuster against something that wasn't going to be enacted in any case, has made him the poster child for the very partisan obstructionism which the American people so despise in Congress.

Bad move, NR. 

Despite the efforts of Drudge, CNN, and other sites shilling for other candidates, three polls have confirmed that Marco Rubio has cut his deficit in half in the Florida caucuses next week. Rubio beat Donald Trump in the early voting by 25 points. Rubio isn't dead quite yet,  and if he wins Florida- especially if John Kasich also wins Ohio- it will be a very different ball game not only in terms of Il Duce's prospect of getting the delegates he needs to be nominated but in terms of the delegate count. And unlike either Trump or Cruz,  Rubio can win. In fact, he's the opponent Hillary fears the most.

If Rubio loses, the best bet the GOP has would be an open convention, and the nomination of a fresh face who didn't run this year and everybody can rally behind. But Ted Cruz is not the answer.

Still, one thing can be said for Cruz. As Lutheran theologian Jack Kilcrease as pointed out, Cruz is, at worst, another Goldwater. If he's nominated he GOP would lose the presidency, probably lose the Senate, and, of course, lose what humanly speaking is our last shot at saving the Supreme Court and the Constitution and reversing or altering Obergefell v. Hodges   and Roe v. Wade. But as was the case in 1964, the Party could go about the process of picking up the pieces and rebuilding toward an almost certain victory in 2020.

But If Trump is nominated, it may be the end of the Republican party. Certainly there will be a moral stain on the Republican brand it will take a generation to wear away.

It has to be admitted that if the GOP nominates Cruz while it will lose the election and a great deal more, it will at least not lose its soul.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…