Skip to main content



In its understandable and commendable desire to stop Donald Trump, National Review has endorsed Ted Cruz.

Cruz, like Donald Trump, is unelectable. He has never to my knowledge renounced his Dominionist heritage or his father's claim that he is one of God's anointed "End Time Kings" ordained to "redistribute the wealth."

Making Leviticus American civil law? Redistributing the wealth? These are not hallmarks of a conservative of any kind, and especially a Constitutional conservative. Cruz needs to address these things.

But beyond that, he simply doesn't play well with others. He is cordially despised by his fellow members of the Republican Senate caucus, and his inflexibility does not bode well for his dealings with the leaders of other nations. And his "shut down the government" crusade, as well the spectacle of his personal and rather a bizarre filibuster against something that wasn't going to be enacted in any case, has made him the poster child for the very partisan obstructionism which the American people so despise in Congress.

Bad move, NR. 

Despite the efforts of Drudge, CNN, and other sites shilling for other candidates, three polls have confirmed that Marco Rubio has cut his deficit in half in the Florida caucuses next week. Rubio beat Donald Trump in the early voting by 25 points. Rubio isn't dead quite yet,  and if he wins Florida- especially if John Kasich also wins Ohio- it will be a very different ball game not only in terms of Il Duce's prospect of getting the delegates he needs to be nominated but in terms of the delegate count. And unlike either Trump or Cruz,  Rubio can win. In fact, he's the opponent Hillary fears the most.

If Rubio loses, the best bet the GOP has would be an open convention, and the nomination of a fresh face who didn't run this year and everybody can rally behind. But Ted Cruz is not the answer.

Still, one thing can be said for Cruz. As Lutheran theologian Jack Kilcrease as pointed out, Cruz is, at worst, another Goldwater. If he's nominated he GOP would lose the presidency, probably lose the Senate, and, of course, lose what humanly speaking is our last shot at saving the Supreme Court and the Constitution and reversing or altering Obergefell v. Hodges   and Roe v. Wade. But as was the case in 1964, the Party could go about the process of picking up the pieces and rebuilding toward an almost certain victory in 2020.

But If Trump is nominated, it may be the end of the Republican party. Certainly there will be a moral stain on the Republican brand it will take a generation to wear away.

It has to be admitted that if the GOP nominates Cruz while it will lose the election and a great deal more, it will at least not lose its soul.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…