Skip to main content

Here's how Trump could be stopped at Cleveland

Again, it almost certainly won't happen. But only 900 or so of the 1,237 delegates needed to nominate somebody at the Republican convention next week are firm Trump supporters, and the NeverTrump coalition of real Republicans are mounting an effort to nominate somebody else.

It's all legal, and if a majority of delegates agree, there is no way to stop it. Here's how it could happen.

Effectively, we'll know which way this will go Monday night with the vote on adopting the rules. If the rules are adopted as the Rules Committee sends them to the floor, it's all over. But if the convention votes to adopt a minority report inserting a "conscience clause" allowing delegates to vote for whom they will, there is probably a better than fifty-fifty chance that somebody other than Trump will emerge from Cleveland as the nominee.

Though the Trumpsters continue to try to confuse the issue, the Supreme Court ruled long ago that state laws requiring delegates to vote a certain way even on the first ballot are unconstitutional. The SCOTUS decision in Democratic Party v. Wisconsin ex rel LaFollette in 1981 was just reinforced by a district court ruling in Virginia as reported by this blog.

So it's all a matter of what the delegates themselves decide to do. Conventions have traditionally been deliberative bodies which themselves chose the nominees with only advice from the primary voters- and before the present primary-driven system was adopted in 1972 unquestionably did a much better job of it than the rank-and-file have since (if you doubt that, take a look at the quality of the nominees before and after 1972!). Moreover, the argument that it would be undemocratic if the convention were to select somebody other than Trump runs afoul of two basic facts. The first is that Trump only received the votes of slightly more than a third of the Republican primary voters- and there can be no doubt that the majority of the voters preferred somebody other than Trump. They voted for somebody other than Trump! Secondly, the very strong likelihood is that a majority of the primary voters would have preferred almost anybody other than Trump. Trump's nomination would be a triumph of a plurality over the majority.

All hell will break loose if Trump is denied the nomination. But it is the only possible way for the Republican party to either remain true to its historic principles or to have a snowball's chance in the nether regions of winning in November.

Pray for the minority report and the NeverTrumpers. If they fail, we get Hillary Clinton as our president for the next four years.

Graphic by DonkeyHotey

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…