Defending the indefensible
Seems that the editor of that reporter who planted hostile questions for Sec. Rumsfeld with the troops in Iraq is heavily committed to defending the indefensible.
The guy has lost any professional credibility he ever had, and defending him is causing the credibility of his paper to leak badly. He needs to be fired. What he did was absolutely unethical.
The guy has lost any professional credibility he ever had, and defending him is causing the credibility of his paper to leak badly. He needs to be fired. What he did was absolutely unethical.
Comments