Skip to main content

Mollie's writing a book

I had an interesting talk after church today with Mollie Ziegler, the journalist who has done such good stuff on the participation of Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod Atlantic District President David Benke in the syncretistic worship service organized by Mayor Giuliani and Oprah Winfrey and held in Yankee Stadium in the aftermath of 9/11.

Dr. Benke had once previously violated his church body's prohibition on participation in joint worship services with those whose basic beliefs contradict its own, and had promised never to do it again. But he nevertheless did precisely that at Yankee Stadium- with the permission of revisionist LCMS president Gerald Kieschnick, who gave that permission in spite of the fact that some participants in the service worshipped entirely different deities! President Kieschnick re-interpreted the Synod's rules to permit participation in multi-god worship services on exceptional occasions, even denying that an event advertised as a prayer service and consisting entirely of prayers, hymns, and homilies was a worship service at all- on the ground that hot dogs were sold in the stands! And so it was that a Missouri Synod Lutheran pastor- and a District President at that- invited Moslems, Buddhists, and others who deny the cardinal Lutheran affirmation that only through Christ do our prayers find acceptance to join him in prayer- and then was supported not only by the president of the Synod, but by the Synod itself, in the intellectually dishonest claim that he had not prayed "with" these people, but only "in their midst!"

Since then, Benke and Kieschnick have been vindicated by the Synod in convention assembled, while faithful leaders who objected have been dismissed from their jobs, defeated for re-election to synodical office, and generally rewarded for their faithfulness with distain and disgrace.

The Missouri Synod seems headed for schism; to borrow a phrase from Howard Dean, the "Missouri Synod wing of the Missouri Synod" may well break off and form a new body loyal to the traditional teachings of the Synod, abandoned and sneered at by the Kieschnick folks, after the next convention, if (as I expect) the revisionist party retains power.

But back to Mollie. She is presently writing a book, tentatively titled Interfaith is No Faith: How Religious Relativism is Destroying the Church, that asks a simple but profound question: why is it that Americans are afraid to believe their own religions? Why is it that we are so intolerant of any belief system that doesn't agree with the culturally orthodox notion that it really doesn't matter what you believe?

True diversity is impossible in such a situation. So is true tolerance. One has to disagree with somebody in order to be tolerant of their beliefs, and disagreeing about anything that matters (or at least admitting that anything we disagree about possibly could matter) seems anathema to the spirit of the times, if not the American ethos itself.

Why should such a patently absurd attitude be so precious to us?

How did we come to be so rigid in only permitting one set of convictions regarding ultimate questions in our culture- the one that says that it doesn't matter what answer you give? Why is it so difficult for Americans to grasp the simple proposition that to the extent that if all religions are correct, none of them are? Why are we afraid to grasp the challenge of seeking to be a truly diverse society, which acknowledges the legitimacy of actually disagreeing with one another on ultimate questions which everyone acknowledges ultimately matter?

Why do we, as a nation, fear to approach the radically exclusive religious beliefs to which we give lip service with a modicum of honesty and intellectual integrity, recognizing that in a truly tolerant society its members must hold mutually exclusive beliefs, if tolerance is even to be possible?

I can't wait to read it Mollie's book. Our national horror of religious integrity is something striking enough, obvious enough in its dishonesty, and rips the substance from the convictions of each and every one of the religions Americans hold with such obvious and shameless violence that the inability of most Americans to see the problem seems incomprehensible. Maybe she can help the more thoughtful among us understand this cultural absurdity a little better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…