Ah. That explains everything!
Bunnie has waded through the verbiage of the United Methodist decision to re-instate that lesbian pastorette, and figured out that ther grounds were that the United Methodists had never actually defined "practicing homosexual."
The definition of "sophistry" can be found here.
Or perhaps they reasoned that she must no longer be a practicing homosexual, because by now she must certainly have become proficient.
Or could the decision just be a transparently dishonest Post-Modernist, Nietschian exercise in interpreting "truth" as "the will to power," and mangling language and reality in whatever way is necessary to get, by hook or by crook, where you want to go despite the logical or moral obstacles?
The definition of "sophistry" can be found here.
Or perhaps they reasoned that she must no longer be a practicing homosexual, because by now she must certainly have become proficient.
Or could the decision just be a transparently dishonest Post-Modernist, Nietschian exercise in interpreting "truth" as "the will to power," and mangling language and reality in whatever way is necessary to get, by hook or by crook, where you want to go despite the logical or moral obstacles?
Comments