Skip to main content

A grand old idol?

Great discussion over at The Burr in the Burgh on one of my personal pet peeves: flags, national and otherwise, in the chancel- or even in the sanctuary, for that matter- of a church.

The origin of the custom of displaying the American flag in the front of the sanctuary of at least Lutheran churches is an interesting one. During the First World War, American Lutherans- being predominently German in ethnicity, and to a significant degree even German speaking- started displaying the flag there to demonstrate that their loyalty was to the United States, and not to the Kaiser, This was no obvious point, given that everybody was singing and praying, and the guy in the black robe and the funny, tabbed collar was preaching, auf Deutsch!

Ironically, in Germany- as in just about every other country on Earth- the display of a national flag in the sanctuary (and especially in the chancel) of a church was unheard of, and would have been seen as highly inappropriate. The citizenship which has significance in church on Sunday morning is not, after all, citizenship in any mere earthly kingdom! American Lutherans took the unheard-of step displaying the American flag in the front of their churches for precisely the same reasons that the good burghers of Berlin, Ontario threw the statue of the Kaiser in the town square into the lake, and changed the name of their city to Kitchner!

Liturgically, no symbol of any loyalty other than our loyalty to God has any place in especially in the chancel. That's God's turf- and whether we intend it or not, having an American flag in the chancel makes a liturgical statement identifying God with the United States of America, and implicitly involving us in idolatry. Elsewhere, the American flag may be a symbol of a God-pleasing loyalty, as well as of many glorious and exalted principles and ideas; in the chancel, however, it's an idol, at least by the implication of its location.

Even in the front of the church, outside the altar rail, the American flag is at best problematic. Again, there is only one citizenship which matters for the purposes for which people gather in that particular place, and it is a citizenship which is not that of any earthly kingdom. The so-called "Christian Flag, " by the way, is a banal liturgical white elephant of Methodist origin invented for no other purpose than to prevent a speaker's platform on a stage from looking lopsided when an American flag was displayed on one side of the podium. It has no particular liturgical significance as a symbol of the Kingdom of God, and never has had.

The reason why Lutherans, at least, first made the liturgically inappropriate gesture of placing the American flag in the front of their sanctuaries thankfully no longer exists. And a national flag at in the chancel- or even in the front of the sanctuary- is a jarring statement to believers from other countries who happen to visit that they are implicitly being defined out of the family. While I once saw a Canadian flag in the front of a church while worshipping in Toronto, in literally no other nation on Earth is it the custom to display the national flag in the one place where earthly nationality simply does not matter. And in no other country on Earth would it be seen as appropriate.

I defer to no one in my love for that flag, and everything it properly stands for. For that very reason, I want to see it put in the fellowship hall, where it belongs.

But at the very least, there is a liturgical imperative to take it out of the chancel. It's a grand old flag, but it simply has no business being implicitly identified with God- or where it can even give the implication that the Kingdom of God is being confused with any earthly country, however well and however deservedly beloved.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…