Skip to main content

Good Friday: the most important day of the Church Year

Image hosted by

In the Western Church, the Christian holiday that gets all the play is Christmas. That's the one day of the year everything is closed, and everybody takes the day off. Even non-Christians often celebrate what has become a secular, universal side of a specifically Christian holiday. Doubtless the Roman Catholic emphasis on the Incarnation as the center of the Faith plays a role here. Then, too, there's the rich secular tradition of Christmas in the West. It's a season famous for filling believer and non-believer alike with "the Christmas spirit." Even unbelieving homes are often visited by Santa Claus. And if one is a believer, the Christmas Eve candlelight service and the singing of Silent Night is a high point of one's spiritual year. The plentitude of sacred Christmas carols- known, at least to some extent, by nearly everyone, so completely do they permeate the culture- makes Christmas perhaps the one day of the year when it's hardest to ignore the Christian moorings of our culture.

In the Eastern Church, it's Easter that's the big holiday. That's understandable, too, since in Eastern theology it's death, more than sin, that is the enemy Christ came to conquer. And even in the West, Easter gets second place. Everybody has a family dinner, and if a person who is remotely Christian goes to church one Sunday in the year, it's apt to be Easter.

In the West, we rationalize our way into somehow seeing Easter as at least the high point of Holy Week. After all, the apostle assures us that were Christ not raised, our faith would be in vain. And it is on Easter that Christ's victory not only over death but also over sin was made manifest.

It's easy to get excited about cute, tiny babies in mangers, or Christ's victory over death- which is, for believers, our victory, too. Not so easy, though, to look at what I would argue is, in a Lutheran understanding, the real high point of the Church Year: Good Friday.

If justification is the doctrine by which the Church stands or falls, as Luther asserted, then how can Good Friday not be the center of Lutheran spirituality? Is the Incarnation important, and in fact central? Of course! But as Jesus Himself observed of His Passion, "It is for this cause that I came into the world." And the bottom line is that- as important as Easter is- it was made inevitable by Good Friday. When Christ cried out, "It is finished!," Easter, so to speak, was in the bag. It was when God died that death had bitten off more than it could chew, and became a defeated enemy. In the last analysis, Easter is only the playing out of the victory won on Good Friday. It's formal proclamation of victory over sin and death after the enemy has already been rendered helpless by the outcome of the Battle of Mt. Calvary.

But Good Friday doesn't get much respect. We're in a hurry to get to Easter- and no wonder. It's lots of fun to celebrate eternal life. It's not so much fun to contemplate how it was won.

It's not just that that bloody Man hanging on the cross offends our sensibilities- though better, if a cross is displayed, that it be a nice, clean sterile empty one. In fact, though, there's a growing tendency among congregations afflicted with the Church Growth Movement cancer is not to display a cross at all- not even an empty one- because it's a "downer" that turns people off! Seems to me that that says all that needs to be said about the Church Growth Movement, btw!

The real problem with contemplating that Man on the Cross is that we have to confront the reason why He's there. The story of Good Friday is, to be sure, Gospel; in fact, ultimately, it's all the Gospel there is. Whatatever other good news God has for us flows from it like the blood and water from Christ's wounded side. But it's also Law- and our Old Adams don't like Law much. Looking at a crucifix, though, it's hard to avoid.!

Every wound, every scar of the lash, every drop of blood and beat of sweat that fell from that Man was our own doing. As the hymn rightly says,

Who was the guilty? Who brought this upon Thee?
Alas, my treason, Jesus, hath undone Thee!
Twas I, Lord Jesus; I it was denied thee;
I crucified Thee.

To look upon a crucifix is to be confronted not only by our own sinfulness, but by its seriousness. We're fond of rationalizing our sin, and thinking of ourselves as relatively good. But the crucifix forces us to confront our moral worthiness- or rather, our lack of it- in absolute terms. Not only are we not "good" people- even the best of us- but people so bad that it took that to set our account right again. God Himself had to endure that, so deep is our guilt and so miserable our fall.

Not a popular message. No surprise that we're so anxious to get to Easter.

There's a modern American Protestant rationalization that the empty cross somehow symbolizes Easter and the Resurrection. Nonsense. The cross would be just as empty if Christ had rotted in His tomb. Reformed Protestantism, of course, traditionally frowns on the crucifix because of the problem it has with Christology; missing the point that the Man on the Cross is, in fact, the God the Jews not only might not, but could not, portray, they think it at least runs the danger of being a graven image. Pr. Paul McCain is sure that their motivation for removing the corpus had nothing to do with the fact that in the Middle Ages it symbolized the Real Presence of Christ in the Supper, but it's patent that it's for that very reason that Lutherans at least in Germany retained it.

As should we. I'm not talking, either, about "Touchdown Jesus-" the Roman Catholic motif of a crowned Christ in Eucharistic vestments holding aloft arms unattached to a cross which in effect is His throne. The crucifix ought to be something we shudder a little to look at. It should be something that proclaims, not just the Gospel, but the Law in its Second and most important use: to show us our need of Good Friday.

Nothing wrong with celebrating Christmas and Easter. But the focus of the Church Year really ought to be on Good Friday. It was then that the victory was won of which Easter was a mere playing out. It was then that the whole purpose of the Incarnation was accomplished.

The crucifix is both Law and Gospel, reduced to a single image. And Good Friday is also both Law and Gospel, reduced to a single day.


Eric Phillips said…
I love Good Friday. I'm about to go to the service, and it's gonna be great. But Easter is still the high point for me. The whole triduum is one amazing story, and Easter is the grand finale.
Bob Waters said…
Grand finale, sure. Just not the climax.

Popular posts from this blog

"The Handmaid's Tale" is stupid

No, Elizabeth Moss. Restricting the ability of American women to sentence their unborn children to death on a whim would not transform the United States into the misogynistic nightmare The Handmaid's Tale calls "the Republic of Gilead."

Neither Margaret Atwood's silly, paranoid tale about the Christians who are coming to get you or Hulu's adaptation of it is "timely" (Washington Post), "chillingly real" (San Francisco Chronicle), or  has any special "relevance to Trump's America" except insofar as through it the disconnect between reality and the lurid imaginations of the cultural left have demonstrated yet again that our delusional president isn't the only one who is bonkers.

No. The Christians are not out to get you. Not even the Fundamentalists. You could make a pretty good case that the "progressives" are, though.

If you go to a public university, you had better agree with the left or you will be in danger of n…

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…