Skip to main content

Obama on Iraq: the doubletalk begins

I've always maintained that Barack Obama is too intelligent and- yes- responsible a man to simply pull American troops out of Iraq in eighteen months if he is elected president. It would be a move so breathtakingly disastrous in both humanitarian and in foreign policy terms that the only people who have absolutely no idea what they're talking about (or worse, don't care) could possibly see this as a rational course of action- especially now that, thanks to the surge, Iraq seems well on its way to achieving stability and being able to stand on its own if only we are patient.

And now, Obama is broadly hinting that he might revise his eighteen-month timetable- if withdrawing our troops within that time would either endanger our troops or destabilize Iraq.

Which is like saying "if the sun comes up tomorrow morning."

Obama, in his naivette, might once have actually intended to pull our troops out of Iraq in eighteen months, and thought that he could pull it off. But to borrow a bon mot from the late William F. Buckley, I refuse to insult Obama's intelligence- or his humanity- by believing that, now that he's being forced to confront the consequences of such foolishness, he would ever actually follow through.

Whether Obama is elected or not, the troops will still be in Iraq at the time of the 2010 midterm elections- and if he's the president, his nutty supporters will eat him alive for it.

Which raises the essential dilemma posed by the Obama pledge: did he start out so utterly naive that only now beginning to sense the lay of the land in Iraq? Or has the pullout plan been a cynical lie all along?

I, for one, choose to believe the former.

ADDENDUM: Sure enough- the moonbats have begun barking about Obama's recently saner tone on Iraq- and he's flip-flopping again!


Popular posts from this blog

No, Trump is not going to be re-elected

And I don't see how anybody but a totally delusional Trumper would even think that he might be.

True, the economy is going great guns. It's continuing on the trajectory Barack Obama set it on when on his watch we emerged from the depths of the Great Recession. The numbers just don't lie. This is the Obama Economy, and Donald Trump has had very little if anything to do with it.

But the chief characteristic of Trump supporters seems to be that they are delusional. They keep bragging about totally imaginary accomplishments while ignoring the embarrassing and telling fact that despite occasional flukes in right-leaning polls done by Rasmussen and Fox News and such, not once since he lost the popular vote on Election Day of 2016 has Mr. Trump managed to emerge from underwater in the consensus of his popularity ratings.

Not once.

There is an axiom in politics that when an incumbent is under 50% in the polls, he's in trouble. Only on rare occasions has Mr. Trump's approva…

"The Handmaid's Tale" is stupid

No, Elizabeth Moss. Restricting the ability of American women to sentence their unborn children to death on a whim would not transform the United States into the misogynistic nightmare The Handmaid's Tale calls "the Republic of Gilead."

Neither Margaret Atwood's silly, paranoid tale about the Christians who are coming to get you or Hulu's adaptation of it is "timely" (Washington Post), "chillingly real" (San Francisco Chronicle), or  has any special "relevance to Trump's America" except insofar as through it the disconnect between reality and the lurid imaginations of the cultural left have demonstrated yet again that our delusional president isn't the only one who is bonkers.

No. The Christians are not out to get you. Not even the Fundamentalists. You could make a pretty good case that the "progressives" are, though.

If you go to a public university, you had better agree with the left or you will be in danger of n…

Kasich won't run next year. I don't know whether this is good news or bad news.

Former Ohio Gov. John Kasich is a serious, well-known man with no known baggage who could unite sane Americans of goodwill against the extremes and give them a voice in American politics they are lacking at present. I and many others had hoped that he might lead a third-party effort next year so that we would have a non-crazy alternative to the two extremist political parties who monopolize the stage today.

My great fear was that he would listen to those who were encouraging him to take the hopeless and suicidal step of challenging President Trump for the nomination of a Republican Party that has sold its soul to the White Nationalists, the nativists, and the alt-right pretty much from top to bottom.

The good news is that he realizes how thoroughly the Republican rank-and-file is behind our thoroughly regrettable president. He won't run for the nomination. The bad news is that he doesn't sound like he's going to lead a third-party ticket, either.

It sounds like publisher B…