Skip to main content

Huntsman is history

Jon Huntsman has has endorsed gay "marriage."

He is now off my presidential radar.

ADDENDUM: And it's a crying shame. As a third-party candidate, Huntsman in his previous incarnation ( pro-life, and favoring civil unions but NOT "marriage" for same-sex couples) could have not only provided a rational and moderate alternative who put the good of the country ahead of partisan ideological squabbles and restored the comity which in previous ages had (generally) allowed the institutions of the Republic to thrive, while providing social conservatives like myself who have difficulty accepting the ideological rigidity and extremism of those who probably constitute the majority of the Republican party today, and whose social conscience extends to the poor and the disadvantaged as well as to the unborn and the foundational institutions and values of our society, with a viable alternative to choosing which part of our values we have to violate every time we vote.

Now, he will probably serve as a rallying point for those few in the GOP who have been seduced by the mantra of the liberal media that the only way for Republicans to win is to become Democrats in all but name. Even if he won the nomination (it would take the largest miracle since biblical times), he would have no chance of winning; why should the American people vote for an ersatz Democrat when they can vote for a real one?

Even as a third-party candidate, Huntsman would now have virtually no constituency- and no point. He would be no more able to conciliate the Right than any Democrat; he has forfeited any credibility as a conservative he had. Neither would the crazies on the Left be willing to meet him on the moderate center ground; he would be regarded there as a crazy right-winger who might as well be a member of the Tea Party for his still relatively conservative economic policies.

Jon Huntsman could have made history. Instead, he will be a minor footnote in it, if that.

And as I said, it's a crying shame. But instead of making history, Jon Huntsman is history.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…