Skip to main content

Pentagon agrees with bigot Weinstein: Christians should be 'in the closet'

The Pentagon has confirmed that members of the armed forces who share their Christian faith can be courtmartialed for it.

Anti-Christian activist Mickey Weinstein, with whom Obama administration officials have met in order to formulate policy in this area,  calls the expression of personal religious convictions "spiritual rape," and says that those who exercise their First Amendment right to religious expression are "enemies of the Constitution."

Being willing to "make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you," but to do it with "gentleness and respect," is specifically commanded in 1 Peter 3:14-16. It is a religious duty for Christians, and therefore as clearly protected by the First Amendment as is the right of others to decline to be engaged on the subject. But here we have yet another example of radical secularists and Leftists deciding that the Constitution is unconstitutional. It appears that steps could theoretically be taken against Christian members of the military even if the conversation was initiated by someone else.

Retired Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin, vice-president of the Family Research Council, thinks the issue may be a matter of confused categories. "It’s a matter of what do they mean by 'proselytizing,' Boykin said. "I think they’ve got their defintions a little confused.

"If you’re talking about coercion that’s one thing, but if you’re talking about the free exercise of our faith as individual soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines, especially for the chaplains, they I think the worst thing we can do is stop the ability for a soldier to be able to exercise his faith.”

The FRC is a conservative Christian organization that is currently circulating a petition asking Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel to reconsider the policy.

HT: Drudge

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…