Skip to main content

ONE GOAL!: Just sayin'




Something I want to get off my chest:

Officials disallowing goals for irrelevant reasons is- like pucks ricocheting off multiple players into the net- a part of hockey. I will not descend to the level of the Boston sportswriters who tried to dismiss the Blackhawks' victory in that Game 1 Stanley Cup Final marathon as "luck" becuse the shot that won it bounced off two Hawk players on the way into the net, and because the goal that tied it went in off a player's skate- as if all games decided by teams as evenly matched as these didn't finally come down to luck, in one way or another.

But whether the official lost sight of the puck and forgot to blow his whistle or not had nothing to do with Hossa's goal. The whistle didn't blow, and the referee's human fallibility shouldn't negate a perfectly legitimate goal* . By rights, Hossa's tally  should have stood, the Hawks should have won the Game 2 to 1 in regulation, and the game should never have gone to overtime for the Bruins to win there .

But like the deflected goals that won Game 1 for the good guys, them's the breaks. Bottom line: Boston deserved to win Game because when the chips were down- in overtime, during that final surge- they wanted it more. Maybe the Hawks were tired. But so were the Bruins, and they somehow found the strength to take care of business.

It's a formula that's worked for us all season long. This time, the tables were turned. Credit is due where credit is due.

Tonight's Game 3  in Boston- and in each and every subsequent game in the series- will be decided the same way. The winner will, to be sure, be the team that gets the breaks; it always is.

But more than that, it will be the team that wants it more, and does what needs to be done to get it.

In a series between teams as evenly matched as these, it could not be any other way. And that's the reason why I believe that this Stanley Cup Final will go down in history as one of the best of all time.

*ADDENDUM: To clarify, the rule as presently written allows the ref to disallow the goal if he INTENDED to blow the whistle. It's a pretty bogus rule IMHO, and a great many others think so, too. But it is the rule. The goal was properly disallowed. But the rule badly needs to be changed back to the old rule. which required the whistle to actually blow before the puck crosses the goal line.

In any event, as the CBC announcer says, at the time the puck crossed the goal line the ref's hands were at his sides. The whistle was nowhere near his mouth. It was, in essence, a good break for the Bruins, and a bad one for the Hawks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…