Skip to main content

ONE GOAL!: The Kings are dead. Long live the Blackhawks!

As those who read this blog know, I'm ordinarily well-disposed toward teams with names inspired by family Ursidae. The Bears and the Cubs are dear to my heart.

The Bruins? Not so much. At least for the next week or two.

My Blackhawks are playing the Bruins this week in the Stanley Cup Finals- and this time, the Ursines are going down.

The Hawks ousted the defending Stanley Cup Champion Los Angeles Kings from the playoffs Saturday night in double overtime by a score of 4-3. The Hawks won the series four games to one.

The puck will drop for the first game of the Finals at the United Center at 7:30 On Central on Wednesday..

As a special bonus, we won't have to listen to the NBC play-by-play announcer rooting for the Kings anymore.

The decisive Game Five shouldn't have gone to overtime. In the first place, when you're fewer than ten seconds away from the Stanley Cup Finals, you really should find a way to avoid allowing the tying goal. While Corey Crawford, the Jennings Trophy winner who by rights should, after the year he's had,  also win the Vezina Trophy (but won't be considered) has had  a phenomenal year, he does seem to have a propensity for giving up goals just as penalties or periods are about to expire.

After Patrick Kane put the Hawks ahead with what should have been the game winner with 3:52 left in regulation.Crow let a deflection by Mike Richards get by him with nine seconds left on the clock

It took an overtime period and a half for  Kane to take a pass from Jonathan Toews on a two-on-one break and complete his hat trick,  winning the Campbell Bowl, emblematic of the Western Conference championship, for the Warriors of the Four Feathers.

Following tradition, no Blackhawk touched the trophy at the presentation ceremony. This symbolizes the fact that it's the Stanley Cup, and not merely the Campbell Bowl, that they're after- and that they'll reserve their celebrating for the moment when they can hoist that trophy aloft.

Secondly, the Hawks let the Kings off the mat. This team gets it done when it has to. But it seems to relax when things are going well and not to play its best hockey. When the Hawks are playing their emotional, up-tempo, all-the-stops-out best, they are virtually unstoppable. But both the Detroit and the Los Angeles series featured lesser teams coming back on them when the Hawks seemed to presume upon their own skill, and if not exactly coast, at least not to play with the emotion they exhibit when the chips are down.

Now they'll be facing a Boston Bruins team which ousted the only team in the NHL which, at the level of skill, is in the same class as the Hawks- the Pittsburgh Penguins- in four straight. The Hawks would clearly have matched up better with the Pens than with the Bruins, since they could have played at the same level of skill as Pittsburgh while being physical enough to disrupt the Pens game in much the same manner as the Bruins did, although perhaps not to the same degree.

Still, if Boston thinks the Finals will be a replay of the Wales Conference series just completed, they're in for a rude surprise. The Hawks, it's true, are a team that depends on skill rather than size and physicality. But they have a great deal more size and physical toughness than the Pens do, even so.

The Bruins are the type of team that can theoretically beat a team as skilled as the Hawks, who- thinking back to the NHL of my youth- are essentially the Montreal Canadians of '71's to... well, Boston's 1971 Blackhawks, whom the Habs defeated in the Finals that year.

But as Hawk fans of a certain age remember all too well, it was the Flying Frenchmen who raised the Cup that year- although in one of the most exciting series and one of the greatest Game Sevens in Stanley Cup history.

My prediction is that history will repeat: Chicago in seven.



Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…