Skip to main content

ONE GOAL!: This series could be one for the ages

This could well turn out to be one of the greatest Stanley Cup Finals in history.

Trailing 3-1 in the third period of Game One last night, the Hawks displayed the same heart they showed in coming back from a three games to one deficit in the Detroit series and winning it.

First Dave Bolland scored to cut the Boston lead to one. Then Johnny Oduya tied it.

And then- after the fifth longest game in Stanley Cup (and therefore NHL) history- Michal Rozseval took a shot from the point. It hit Bolland, ricocheted off  Andrew Shaw, and slipped past Boston goalie Tuukka Rask and into the net.

Final score: Chicago 4, Boston 3 in triple overtime.

The Boston take on the game is hilarious.

The Hawks won with their secret weapon: heart. It's what, I'm convinced, is going to win them the Cup- though I concede that it will probably take seven games. I understand that a writer for USA Today opined the other day that if these two teams played each other a hundred times, each would win fifty.

That's close to the truth. The Bruins and the Blackhawks are the two best defensive teams in the NHL. They have two superlative goalies in Rask and Corey Crawford. The Bruins play a somewhat better physical game; the Hawks have more skill. But a more evenly matched series would be hard to imagine.

This is going to be a heartbreak for somebody. But it will be a whole lot of fun for everybody until that moment comes. And right now, I'm betting that the team with the biggest hearts- the team that plays its home games in Chicago- will be celebrating all summer long.

Game Two- which in many ways will actually be Game Three, last night's contest having been nearly two full games long- will be at the United Center at 7:00 Saturday night.




Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…