Skip to main content

Bravo, Gov. Christie!


I alternate between being amused and annoyed by the wholly irresponsible, purely theoretical, ivory tower dogmatism of the libertarian movement, whose defining characteristic seems to be a stubborn insistence on policies suitable only in Thomas More's Utopia- and a 1789 Utopia, at that.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, many of whose constituents bear the scars of 9/11, has taken on Rand Paul and the other libertarians in Congress, who can't seem to get it through their heads that there are people out there who want to kill us and our children, and that it's not our fault.

Asked about the narrow margin by which a bi-partisan libertarian coalition failed recently to defund government surveillance programs, Christie called  Paul and his allies "dangerous."

“You can name any one of them that’s engaged in this," Christie said, "... these esoteric, intellectual debates — I want them to come to New Jersey and sit across from the widows and the orphans and have that conversation. And they won’t, because that’s a much tougher conversation to have.… I’m very nervous about the direction this is moving in.

“The next attack that comes, that kills thousands of Americans as a result," Christie continued,  "people are going to be looking back on the people having this intellectual debate and wondering whether they put… I think what we as a country have to decide is: Do we have amnesia? Because I don’t. And I remember what we felt like on Sept. 12, 2001.”

Christie praised the counter-terrorism efforts of both President Obama and former president George W. Bush.

The response from the Paul camp was predictable. Paul's chief of staff, Doug Stafford, replied, "Defending America and fighting terrorism is the concern of all Americans, especially Sen. Paul. But it can and must be done in keeping with our constitution and while protecting the freedoms that make America exceptional.

Referring to Bruce Springsteen, Stafford continued, “In the words of the Governor’s favorite lyricist, ‘You know that flag flying over the courthouse, means certain things are set in stone. Who we are, what we’ll do and what we won’t.’”

But the Constitution states in its very preamble that among its purposes is to "provide for the common defense and promote the general welfare." Paul and his father, Ron, have suggested that 9/11 was actually an understandable response by people we were abusing by defending our interests in the Middle East. The libertarian allergy to reality begs the question of what that flag and those things mean in a real world in which  madmen and haters fly airplanes into skyscrapers, bomb marathons, and threaten us all with sudden death.

Christie- who is looking more and more to me like my fallback choice in 2016 if Jeb Bush doesn't run- should be commended for taking on a movement seemingly more concerned with governance as an academic exercise than with the realities they would have to face if they ever actually were given the chance to govern. For all of our sakes, and for the sake of that flag and those things that are "set in stone," that cannot be allowed to happen.

HT: Drudge

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…