Skip to main content

The Left's attempt to lynch George Zimmerman

National Review's Rick Lowry gets the Zimmerman trial fiasco exactly right.

Another good summary of the evidence can be found here.

George Zimmerman acted like a jerk, and somebody died. He can't escape the moral responsibility for that fact. But there is no conclusive evidence that he did anything that deserves actual imprisonment. In fact, the bulk of the evidence seems to indicate otherwise

Trayvon Martin, on the other hand, sat on Zimmerman and bashed his head against the concrete. That's the tale the bullet wound tells. Zimmerman  didn't get that broken nose and those wounds on his scalp because he was beating on Trayvon with his head!

While the witnesses differ, it was clear from the outset that there was nothing resembling enough evidence against Zimmerman to get a conviction. Even liberal stalwarts like Alan Derschowicz have said that the charges shouldn't have been brought . We've know all along that there was reasonable doubt at the very least.

But the Left and the media have long since convicted Zimmerman anyway on the basis of what they wanted to be the facts. Now the case has blown up in the prosecution's face, and even the attorney for the Martin family admits that the incident "wasn't about race."

And the drive to lynch George Zimmerman continues, fueled by the myth that the incident was racial and that Zimmerman, not Martin, was the one who flipped out. And the sad thing is that George Zimmerman will never again be safe because of it. There will be a massive outcry if he is convicted, even though the evidence allows no other verdict.

If somebody kills Zimmerman, I wonder whether anybody at, say, MSNBC will be tried for it.

Naw. The Left can be as reckless as it wants, with no consequences.

HT: Real Clear Politics


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…