Skip to main content

Chris Sosa doesn't get it

Chris Sosa of "Salon" says that "Evangelcals" need to "tone down" their views on homosexuality in order to stay "relevant."

First off, opposition to homosexual behavior and to the redefinition of marriage isn't a peculiarity of that branch of Christianity called (with varying degrees of accuracy) "evangelical" Protestantism. Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy share it. So, in fact, does every Christian who seeks to remain faithful to the witness of Scripture, the apostolic tradition, and the Faith as it has been confessed down through the ages.

To depart from the Church's historic disapproval of homosexual behavior and from its confession of marriage as an institution which by definition involves members of both sexes would be to reject the Bible and the historic Christian faith. It would be to admit that Christianity is merely a made-up set of rules and doctrines that can be changed at will. And if that is the case, we're all better off if Christianity were to disappear just as Sosa suggests it might.

If that's the case, Christianity is already irrelevant, and always has been. Just as irrelevant as those denominations- which are all declining far faster than the "evangelicals," btw- who have already chosen the zeitgeist over the Faith once delivered to the saints.

But that's exactly what faithful Christians- "evangelical" and otherwise- deny. So you see. Mr. Sosa, your suggestion isn't going to work. And there are those of us who will decline to deny the Faith no matter what dirty names we're called, what we're accused of, and how few in number we become. Christianity, after all, has always done best as a small minority. It's when it becomes popular and fashionable and attracts the kind of nominal adherents who are vulnerable to appeals like Sosa's that it gets into trouble.

So enough of this dishonest business about "evangelicals" needing to change their teaching. When he (and his fellow clueless secularists) say "Evangelicals" in this context, they mean "the Christian faith." And besides, if Christianity were to change its teaching on homosexuality and/or gay "marriage," it would be then that it would become irrelevant.

Until then, there are those of us who will remain faithful, and the opinion polls and the sneers of the secularists be damned. Our faith is in Christ, not in public opinion. And in fact it's by doing as Mr. Sosa suggests that we really would become irrelevant- and admit as much before all the world.

As Stephen Schwartz paraphrased Jesus, "If salt has lost its savor, it ain't got much in its favor." And to change the consistent teaching of the Bible in every stratum and of the historic Christian faith about homosexuality in order to curry favor with an increasingly apostate public would be to lose our savor completely.

HT: Real Clear Religion


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…