Skip to main content

Time to end the totalitarian embargo on dialogue about homosexuality


Brian Ambrosino is a Baltimore professional dancer and writer. He is also gay.

While I disagree with some of the things he says in this article about the Phil Robertson/A&E "Duck Dynasty" affair (while I regard Robertson's phrasing as tactless and tasteless, I happen to agree with his premise that homosexual behavior is inherently contrary to the primary natural purpose of sexuality and a distortion of others), it seems to me that Ambrosino gets his major point exactly right: there is a great deal more bigotry being expressed on the Left than on the Right where the matter of homosexuality is concerned.

And if you disagree with me about homosexual behavior being unnatural, fine. But don't silence me, and don't stigmatize me.

Convince me.

We are simply not having a debate or dialogue about gay "marriage" or the changing attitudes in our society. The media and Leftist politicians (Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel comes to mind) won't allow it. Deciding pre-emptively  that disapproval of homosexual behavior is ipso facto bigotry and that therefore anyone who disagrees with them is a bigot, they will not engage us. Instead, they seek to silence us. There are comparatively few places in the media where a negative view of homosexual behavior or opposition to gay "marriage" can even be expressed. Where it is, generally only the ugliest and most stupid statements are admitted to the public square, thus ensuring that those who express them will be seen as typical of

Aside from being an essentially totalitarian approach to political controversy, this ensures that positions will be hardened, that nobody is able to reach across the gap and discuss the matter civilly with those who disagree with him or with her except on an individual level, and that consensus on the matter is delayed or prevented. Homosexuality will not become generally accepted in this society through intimidation. Americans aren't made that way.

Unfortunately, it seems that liberals are.

That said, it's been my experience that many gays and lesbians (though much less frequently heterosexual social leftists) are willing to distinguish between hatred on one hand and an honest difference in perception and values on the other. It seems to me a great deal easier to talk to many gays and lesbians about our disagreements than with most straight liberals!

As a social conservative who has gay friends whom he likes, respects, and cares about, I don't think I deserve the rap the social liberals are putting on me. And I wish that dialogue on this matter were possible. Alas, at present, it's simply not.

Ask Phil Robertson what happens when you dare dissent from the attitudes the Big Brothers and Big Sisters of the Left are willing to permit one to hold without being silenced.

HT: Drudge

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…