Skip to main content

Barack Obama: the 'Super-Nixon'

Richard Milhaus Nixon is one of the most tragic figures in American history.

The malicious Left has never been willing to regard our 37th president as anything other than Satan incarnate, and its vitriol against him (not always, I will grant, undeserved) has been a constant ever since his 1950 California Senate race against Helen Gahagan Douglas. To hear the Left tell it, Nixon had no virtues whatsoever.

But history tells another tale. Whatever one might think of Nixon, were it not for Watergate, his accomplishments in the areas of both foreign and domestic policy were such that he would inevitably have been remembered otherwise at the very least as a near-great president. Thus, he's a classic example of the tragic hero as the Greeks saw him: a man who stood on the pinnacle of greatness, only to be undone by a fatal flaw.

Lyndon Johnson is a similar character. In Nixon's case, the flaw was paranoia, leading both to the Watergate affair and to the rest of what he termed (to paraphrase his rather own rather pungent term) his rodent fornication operations; in Johnson's, an inability to admit that he was wrong about the character of the conflict in Southeast Asia, and react- well, as Nixon did.

If there is one thing which remains pre-eminent in our memories of Dick Nixon, it's not detente with the Soviet Union,  or the opening of China, or the effective reversal of our policy in Vietnam, or welfare reform, or the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency, or any of the other achievements which, if "progressives" could but put their personal malice aside, would qualify him as one of the most successful modern presidents even by Democratic standards. It's the "enemies list-" a paranoid assemblage of names belonging to people who had tried to do Dick Nixon in. 

With the exception of Watergate, he doesn't seem to have actually done much with that list. That's where he and Barack Obama differ.

I've often blogged of late of the tendency of "liberals" to attempt to silence dissent from their policies by intimidation. Sometimes it means the denial of tenure (or employment) to a professor whose personal politics do not pass orthodox muster. Sometimes it means denying a license to open a restaurant in Chicago because Dan Cathy disagreed with Mayor Emanuel about gay "marriage." And sometimes it means Barack Obama's favorite tactic: phony-baloney legal action, whether involving trumped-up criminal charges, lawsuits, or simply the abuse of the administrative powers of institutions like the IRS.

If there is a pattern in Obama's career more prominent than his tendency to lie even when he doesn't really have to (as in the case of that uncle he denied, for no particular reason, having ever met, despite having lived with him for a time) or when it makes his situation more complicated rather than less so (his defense against criticism of his killing as a state senate committee chair of the would- be Illinois Born Alive Act was to say that he would have supported it had it contained language similar to that of a subsequent Federal bill safeguarding rights guaranteed by Roe v. Wade- which is odd, since it's subsequently come out that before killing the Illinois bill in committee he and his fellow Democrats had amended it to include even stronger language to that effect than the Federal bill, and then killed it anyway),  it's his tendency to use legal intimidation as a tactic against his opponents and their supporters, whether those opponents were  named are Hillary Clinton or John Edwards or Mitt Romney.

This, of course, was before he had the IRS and the  Department of Justice to do his intimidating for him- an abuse of power that has not only become characteristic of this administration, but is becoming more and more common every day.

As Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer said when filing suit against Clinton supporters in 2008, "There’s going to be a reckoning here. It’s going to be rough — it’s going to be rough on the officers, it’s going to be rough on the employees, it’s going to be rough on the donors."

Oppose Obama in such a way as to cause him serious inconvenience, and there will be a Reckoning. You will not merely be put on a list.

What Nixon had paranoid fantasies about doing, Barack Obama actually is doing. Paul Mirengoff comments on the parallels here.

But of course, it's only despicable- or worthy of comment- when a Republican does it.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…