Skip to main content

Teresa Wagner: poster child for academic- and personal- freedom


I've remarked before on this blog on the degree to which Iowa is a breeding-ground for political extremism, both left and right. The tendency of the Iowa caucuses to push both parties to the extremes by favoring unelectable ideologues over pragmatic statesmen is probably the best single argument against the primacy of the caucuses in the nominating process. And yesterday I blogged the case of an Iowa legislator who thinks that babies should be aborted because they may have colic.

My adopted home state is the scene of another significant struggle in the battle between reason and unreason, between pragmatism and ideology, and between freedom and its curtailment. Yesterday the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in the case of Wagner vs. Jones.

You probably haven't heard of the case. You should. Paul Mirengoff discusses it here, over at PowerLine.

The case involves the failure of the University of Iowa to hire an über-qualified pro-life activist over several much less qualified liberals- one just out of law school- to teach a writing course to law students. The university argued that Teresa Wagner had not been hired because she refused to teach the analysis part of the course. The tapes of the interview had been conveniently destroyed, but surviving faculty emails contradict this claim.

At trial, the jury was unanimous in agreeing that Wagner had been discriminated against because of her political views. A mistrial was declared because it could not agree who was responsible. Wagner is asking the Court of Appeals for a new trial.

Political and religious discrimination against those who do not toe the line of leftist and anti-religious orthodoxy is a fact of life in American higher education. Graduates of public universities can testify to the degree to which grades are as dependent in many cases on agreement with the professor's ideology as with the quality of the student's work, and a public university degree the end result of a liberal education in a somewhat different meaning of the word "liberal" than is traditionally meant by the term. In fact, in that sense of the term, American public universities have a strong tendency to dispense a distinctly illiberal education indeed.

Those who value the notion that higher education should be an arena for the free exchange of ideas and the unfettered pursuit of truth should follow the Wagner case carefully. It is a significant event in the struggle to change American higher education back into an arena for free thought and inquiry, instead of institutions of indoctrination for those who little value such freedom, and prefer to indoctrinate rather than educate.

Oh.. One more thing: it should be said that the University of Iowa Law School now has four Republicans on its faculty.

At the time Wagner was denied her position, it had only one. And 49 Democrats.

Affirmative action, I guess.

ADDENDUM: Here is a summary of yesterday's oral arguments.

And here is an audio file of the arguments themselves. 

Comments

Larry Singleton said…
One of the worst things that have resulted from this Liberalization of our universities is the rank anti-Semitism and Jew-Hatred that is now almost fashionable on our college campuses. The real obscene part of this is the parents who willingly and stupidly send their kids to what are now RE-education and Indoctrination centers. There is one "professor" who was reported to have told his students that his job was to make sure the kids UN-learned all the things their parents had taught them. i.e. morals and common decency. Start you education like I did with these books:

Indoctrination U: The Left's War Against Academic Freedom and The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America by David Horowitz

“Indoctrinate U.” Watch This Documentary!!! (You Tube Video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHyvRHrYYBA

The Least Free Place in America (You Tube video-Prager Univ.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJaM8IOev7E

Ivory Towers On Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America by Martin Kramer
The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men by Christina Hoff Sommers

The Israeli Solution: A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East by Caroline B. Glick. READ THIS BOOK!!!

The Haj by Leon Uris (A Primer on the “right to return” scam)
Lessons from ‘The Haj’ A book review by Joseph Puder
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/joseph-puder/lessons-from-the-haj/print/

and

Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America by Brigitte Gabriel (These three books should be sold as a gift set.)

Amb. Prosor addresses UNGA debate on the Question of Palestine (You Tube) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1--Os_apR0

BDS: The Attempt to Strangle Israel (You Tube)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTuTL8aCx6k

Islamophobia: Thought Crime of the Totalitarian Future by David Horowitz and Robert Spencer (Booklet)

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…