Skip to main content

Ron Paul is still clueless


Ron Paul, whose dedicated cadre of conspiracy theorists, racists, and assorted extremists has amused us all the last couple of elections, still thinks he's living in the 18th Century.

He hasn't gotten the memo that Hitler invaded Poland and nearly conquered the world because Neville Chamberlain had essentially the same view of international relations as Ron Paul does today.

Paul- the social liberal who believes that the U.S., rather than Al Qaeda, was the bad guy on 9/11 and whose bizarre economic theories bemuse conservative and liberal alike- actually defends Russia's effective conquest of the Crimea through a rigged and constitutionally illegal plebiscite, using the same discredited arguments the South used when it tried to illegally secede from the Union.

The irony is that Paul insist that he's a constitutionalist. Strange that he has such little regard for the constitution of the Ukraine- or for international law. Or, for that matter, for the rights of Crimeans who want to remain part of the Ukraine and who have been ruthlessly repressed by Putin's occupying troops and local goons in sympathy with him.

There is a strange sort of consistency in Paul's position, though. The unconstitutional character of Southern secession aside (the Constitution made no provision whatsoever for a state to secede from the Union), in no case did any Southern state show the most basic respect for the rights of dissenters when the Great Treason of 1861 began, or attempt to secede through a process that would have passed the most minimal of muster from the point of view of democracy and the right of self-determination even if it had been legal.

And it wasn't. While the Constitution may have been silent on the issue, the basic principles of American law are not. Even a voluntary contract- and the Union is at the very least that- requires the consent of all parties for it to be dissolved and certain parties to legitimately renounce its obligations under it. The only remotely legal way for secession to have been accomplished would have been through the unanimous consent of a convention of all the states called to consider the matter.

Even one dissenting state would have left the South bound in law to respect the terms of the contract it freely entered into.

In no case where Southern referenda on secession were held was the secret ballot used, and brave enough to vote against secession were generally harassed, had their property destroyed, and were often lynched. Where secession was undertaken by convention, the delegates who voted to secede were often elected on a promise to vote against secession. A large and active resistance movement existed throughout the Confederacy from the very beginning- and it is by no means completely clear that a majority of the white population in a single Southern state actually favored secession, or would have chosen it if given a free choice!

In the South in 1861, as in the Crimea today, dissent is being suppressed. The rich got their way through a rigged and illegal process- and the clueless Mr. Paul to the contrary, the right of self-determination is being squelched, not respected.

The Ron Pauls of this world- the priest and the Levite who pass by the Samaritan in the ditch-  reply, "Who cares?"

Shame on you, Ron Paul. It's people like you who make conservatives appear heartless and mindless. And given your positions on social issues, you ought to be a pariah to Christian conservatives in particular.

HT: Drudge Report

 

Comments

Jeff D said…
Like it or not, the US Constitution is a selfish document. Read the preamble to figure out what it is all about. It was established to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity. Sorry.

The irony is that Paul insist that he's a constitutionalist. Strange that he has such little regard for the constitution of the Ukraine- or for international law.

Which part of the Ukrainian constitution says the USA is responsible for the boarders of the Ukraine? Which part of international law?
Like it or not, the Constitution is no such thing, and "to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity" in the 21st Century (or even the 20th)requires an active and robust use of American power to protect our interests and that of world peace.

Like it or not, this is not 1789 anymore. And like it or not, neither you nor Ron Paul are in the remotest contact with the real world as it actually exists in 2014, nor with any rational application of the Constitution to that world.

The Ukrainian constitution requires that secession obtain the permission of the central government. You know. Kind of like ours did in 1861. And "securing the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity" in 2014 requires the upholding of international law- which forbids countries from invading and conquering other countries. And the United States not only subscribes to that law, and always has, but based its very appeal to the world for recognition of our existence to "the decent opinion of mankind."

Like it or not, neither you nor Ron Paul have learned anything at all from history about how the world works. And like it or not, he's still nuts.

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…