Skip to main content

Vatican Chief Justice: Obama policies "increasingly hostile toward Christian civilization"

It seems to me that Raymond Cardinal Burke- formerly the Archbishop of St. Louis, and now the Vatican's chief justice- pretty much has President Obama's number.

“It is true that the policies of the president of the United States have become progressively more hostile toward Christian civilization. He appears to be a totally secularized man who aggressively promotes anti-life and anti-family policies,” Burke told  Polonia Christiana magazine.

Cardinal Burke accurately accuses Mr. Obama of  trying to “restrict” religion:"“Now he wants to restrict the exercise of the freedom of religion to freedom of worship, that is, he holds that one is free to act according to his conscience within the confines of his place of worship but that, once the person leaves the place of worship, the government can constrain him to act against his rightly-formed conscience, even in the most serious of moral questions.”

Bingo. Mr. Obama- and the Left generally- just don't seem to "get" the idea that separation of church and state doesn't mean the separation of religion and state- an impossibility, insofar as religion reflects people's most deeply held beliefs and values. The movement to abolish slavery, child labor, the death penalty, as well as the Civil Rights movement and the various anti-war movements of the past half-century and, in fact, virtually every major social reform of our history, have all sprung from people's religious convictions.

As long as people who have those convictions urge them on religiously-neutral grounds- that is, on the basis of public policy rather than the content of specific, sectarian religious beliefs- secularists like Mr. Obama have no beef coming. In fact, even when they overstep that boundary, they are no threat; no nation as diverse as ours is apt to be swept away by a sectarian theocratic crusade, the paranoia of the Left to the contrary.

A secularist stifling of freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press, on the other hand, already seems to be taking place before our very eyes, as witness the policies Cardinal Burke comments upon.

Cardinal Burke, one of the few Catholic prelates with the guts to insist that Catholic politicians ought not to advocate policies contrary to the church's teachings, once denied pro-choice, pro-gay "marriage" John Kerry communion. According to the secular media, the current pope- who sometimes does seem to think that giving in to the enemies of the Christian faith within the church will somehow convert them- responded by not reappointing Cardinal Burke to the list of priests eligible to be bishops.

Or did he? Burke's career has bee mostly administrative rather than pastoral, and Pope Francis gave no explanation for his decision.

And a lack of facts has, after all, never deterred them before.

HT: Drudge


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…