Skip to main content

Why women shouldn't be ordained

The Rev. Dr. John W. Kleinig of the Lutheran Church of Australia- a former advocate of women's ordination- explains why he changed his mind.

The North American Lutheran Church (NALC) and the Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ (LCMC) are two new denominations born after the ELCA's renunciation of Scripture and the entire Christian consensus concerning homosexuality. Both- influenced heavily by sentiment and cultural considerations, and never really exposed to the arguments to the contrary- promptly embraced both women's ordination and the equally unbiblical policy of open communion, unknowingly justifying these practices by pretty much the same unsound process by which the ELCA had decided to ordain and "marry" homosexuals and lesbians. In fact, the use of Scripture by these denomination's- composed by people seeking nothing other than to be faithful Christians, and not sufficiently exposed to the other sides of these issues to be aware of the problem- often shows so many signs of sloppy, unconscious ELCA-type eisegesis where exegesis is called for to make we wonder how long it they'll be able to hold off the pressure to join the ELCA and the PCUSA and the other denominations which have decided to eisegete their way out of the biblical and Christian position on homosexuality as well.

Exegesis, it should be noted, is the process of studying a passage for the purpose of drawing meaning from it that its author(s) intended. Eisegesis, on the other hand, is the process of injecting alien meaning into a text, forcing upon it whatever meaning the interpreter would like it to have.

Antonin Scalia is an exegete of American law. Ruth Bader Ginsberg is an eisegete.

Will the NALC and the LCMC merely be smaller, less frenetic versions of the ELCA in ten years? Twenty? It all depends on their willingness to follow Dr. Kleinig's example, and do some exegesis where eisegesis would be the easiest and most natural path.

Oh. And before anybody even says it, Galatians 3:28 does not address the issue. It addresses justification, not ordination- and it's just not intellectually honest to dismiss texts which refer specifically to the matter under discussion in favor of a text referring to an entirely different topic.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…