Skip to main content

Gag me on a milk chocolate cross

Some time ago I took a cellphone shot of an interesting candy item I came across in a store, supposedly celebrating Easter.

It was a milk chocolate cross. A more incongruous object I would have trouble imagining.

I'm reminded of a poem the Wittenburg Door ran a few years ago, which went thus:

On a desk close at hand
Stands a new plastic cross
So lov'ly and popular and nice,
And so easy to hold,
For it promises gold,
And a life that's without sacrifice...

The cross is about suffering. The cross is about God turning the tables on evil by becoming its victim. And the cross is about the pain and sorrow and suffering that God allows to come into our life in order to help us grow, and for our long-term good.

In the public context, it's about bearing the shame of the cross- the shame Jesus bore for us- right along with Him.

It is not optional. It comes with the territory. It's a living, glowing rebuke to the Joel Osteens of this world, the embodiments of the spirit of post-Constantinian Christianity (and especially the American variety) that expects "victory" and jolliness from the symbol of the shame and death and disgrace which is the only path to those things, just as Good Friday was the only way for Christ to get to Easter.

It with the sign of the cross, not the Hershey's logo, that we are signed at our baptisms. It lets us know right from the start what we're getting into.

And so I agree with Robert P. George that the rise of ill-informed and shallow atheism and the general emergent libertarian distain for religion are things to be welcomed, not at which to be frightened.

They remind us what the cross is, and what it's for, and what it stands for. Despite the temptation of the Church Growth Movement to sell it out in order to fill the pews (some Church Growth guides even discourage the use of the cross in decorating the "worship" space on the perceptive but revealing ground that it's a "bummer" and a "buzz-kill), and despite the aberrational but addictive comfort we Americans have known for far to long with an increasingly secular culture which has been more than willing to patronize and thus domesticate us, we are finally being brought home to confront- and to be confronted by- the cross.

So no more theology of glory. Please. Now is the time, not of smiley-face Christianity or easy cultural dominance, but of unpopularity and abuse and ridicule.

Now is the time of the cross.

Instead of songs about how warm and fuzzy Jesus makes us feel, let's try this one:

Onward, therefore, pilgrim brothers!
Onward, with the cross our aid!
Bear its shame and fight its battle
Till we rest beneath its shade.
Soon shall come the great awaking,
Soon the rending of the tomb,
Then the scattering of all shadows,
And the end of toil and gloom.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…