Skip to main content

The WIld aren't turkeys after all



Looks like I sold the Minnesota Wild short.

More to the point, so did the Blackhawks- who, after taking an easy two games to none lead in their best-of-seven second-round series with Minnesota, failed to show up for Games Three and Four, apparently expecting the sight of the mighty Chief on their sweaters alone to terrify the Wild into submission.

It didn't work. As the Hawks slept through the third period of Game Three and all of Game Four, the Wild- a team on the rise, with plenty of character, and a determination and  confidence which had already enabled them  to upset a superior Colorado Avalanche squad in the first round- outworked and outhustled the lackadaisical Hawks so completely enough that an uninformed observer might well have thought that they were the team that has won two Stanley Cups in the past four years, and the guys wearing the Indian heads the second to last Western Conference seed.

Alas, ever since the 2010 Stanley Cup season, this Blackhawks team- almost certainly the best in franchise history- has had one glaring weakness: a tendency to play down to the level of the opposition. They get lazy when playing teams they ought to beat handily- and, as a result, don't. They get cocky, and end up having to make a supreme effort in order to win at all.

Which they do. That's the saving grace which rescues them from the consequences of their weakness. The Hawks, too, are a team of character (last year's legendary series with Detroit being a case in point) which can fight and scratch and claw with the best of them when their backs are to the wall. Adversity brings out this team's character in much the same way that the prospect of easy success submerges it.

Ask the St. Louis Blues about how the Hawks play with their backs to the wall.

Anyway, the Hawks actually deigned to show up for Game Five last night at the United Center. The result was a hard-fought 2-1 victory (see the video above), a three-games-to-two lead in the best-of-seven series, and their rear ends firmly in the driver's seat.

I don't know what will happen in Minnesota Tuesday night when Game Six is played. It's possible that, now aroused and with blood in the water, the Hawks will rise to the occasion and eliminate the Wild then and there. And if not, it's hard for me to imagine their losing a Game Seven at home. They're too much better than the Wild, talent wise. They're also too familiar with what it takes to win a Stanley Cup series, and a team whose character, ferocity, talent, and will makes them all but unbeatable when the chips are down.

But hockey- and especially playoff hockey- is a very psychological game. As I wrote in my post following the Hawks elimination of the Blues, a sense of confidence and the habit of winning (a habit St. Louis has yet to develop, despite the talent on their roster) are as indispensable to playoff success as talent. And the Wild were, in retrospect, well on the way to developing both before this series ever began.

The Blackhawks' decision to take an ill-timed psychological vacation in Games Three and Four only added to the process. The result is that the Wild have the sense that the Stanley Cup champions are beatable, and that determination and maximum effort for the entire sixty minutes of any given game can do the trick.

The Wild are an infinitely more dangerous team now than they were after Game Two. They are a team which, on any night where the Hawks themselves don't put in the maximum effort for all sixty minutes, is fully capable of beating them.  And the Hawks had better not forget that again.

Perhaps it's too much to say that Chicago's two-game snooze has created a monster. The character and tenacity of the Wild themselves have played at least as great a role in their emergence as a genuine threat to the Hawk's hopes of becoming the first team in eighteen years to repeat as Stanley Cup champions. But while at this point I would be very surprised if it were not the Blackhawks who move on to Round Three, that outcome is by no means certain.  I'm confident, yes- but also a little nervous.

As I hope the Hawks are.

And whatever ends up happening in the final game or two of the second round, what has happened so far bodes very well indeed for the future of the Minnesota Wild. They will not win the Stanley Cup this year. But their time is not far in the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…