Skip to main content

Gaystopo tactics in Newton

Newton, Iowa is the county seat of Jasper County and the former headquarters of Maytag Corporation. It's located eight miles west of Kellogg, where I lived for a little over nine years as pastor of two local ELCA churches.

And I fear that the forces of Leftist totalitarianism have reached even Newton.

Bob Eschliman is a Christian- and the former editor of the Newton Daily News. The News fired him Friday for writing an article in his personal blog criticizing "the Queen James Bible," a falsified version of the Bible which writes out its condemnation of homosexuality.

Eschilman- quite properly- is suing the News. The News had this bizarre editorial response:

“The First Amendment does not eliminate responsibility and accountability for one’s words and actions,” Rung wrote. “While he [Bob] is entitled to his opinion, his public airing of it compromised the reputation of this newspaper and his ability to lead it.”

Huh? How could the reputation of the newspaper be compromised by a criticism of a tasteless, insensitive, and blatantly inaccurate and dishonest exercise like the "Queen James Bible?" Seems to me that its firing of Eschilman not only compromises the reputatation of the News, but destroys any argument that can be made for its journalistic integrity.

The bottom line is that Eschilman is the latest Christian to lose his job for publicly expressing disagreement with the Leftist sexual agenda. I trust that nobody seriously believes that he would have been fired for expressing approval of the tasteless and dishonest parody of the Scriptures his blog entry criticized!

Make no mistake: the current struggle over how society relates to homosexuality and whether disapproval of a behavior is tantamount to prejudice or discrimination against those who engage in it isn't just about sexual mores. The Eschilman case simply drives home once again the critical point that whether it's a newspaper editor being fired for expressing a politically incorrect (though quite reasonable) opinion, or the national Administration carrying on a systematic attack on the religious beliefs of those with whom it disagrees, the First Amendment is what is at stake here.

What's at stake is our way of life, and the freedom to dissent even in the public expression of one's religious beliefs.

Or, as in Eschilman's case, even in objecting to an insensitive, tasteless, and intellectually dishonest public insult to those beliefs.

The patently dishonest "Queen James Bible" can be found here. And no- those other passages aren't matters of "interpretation."

They're matters of those responsible for the Queen James Bible "translating" dishonestly. Moreover, one wonders how many passages expressly and clearly condemning homosexual behavior would be necessary before the perpetrators of the QJB decide that they really mean what they say!

And neither, btw, can one "choose" Jesus. Faith is God's gift through the (unfalsified) Word, not- American cultural semi-Pelagianism to the contrary- of our "decision."


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…