Skip to main content

'Lutheran'- Orthodox dialogue founders on LWF post-modernism

In view of their frank rejection of the sola Scriptura and the sola Fide (universalism is widely accepted among them), there is good reason to question whether the churches of the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) are actually, in any historically meaningful sense, Lutheran at all. But it seems that their dialogue with the world Orthodox tradition is breaking down over a more fundamental (excuse the expression) defection on the part of the LWF.

In the words of a 2011 evaluation of the dialogue between the LWF and Orthodoxy by the Orthodox participants,
This Inter-Orthodox evaluation, then, attempts firstly to take stock at this junction of what has been achieved during these thirty years of conversations, secondly to evaluate it in such a way that it is not jeopardized because of divergences and especially because of controversial responses to current issues and problems which have arisen through the challenges of modern society, and thirdly to stress that it does actually provide the basis for new initiatives concerning the future direction and purpose of this Bilateral Dialogue.

From the Orthodox viewpoint, such initiatives are necessitated by new developments that have occurred in the Lutheran Churches since the inception of this bilateral Lutheran Orthodox Dialogue: e.g. the ordination of women on all levels of clerical orders, which is a clear deviation from Christian practice, and the emergence of a new moral-code concerning human sexuality and especially homosexual relations, which has far reaching implications for Christian anthropology, both on the personal and social levels, etc. In the eyes of most Orthodox, these new ecclesiological and controversial anthropological innovations in the Lutheran world constitute radical challenges and serious obstacles to the Orthodox-Lutheran theological dialogue and to its original aim, namely, the promotion of mutual ecclesial rapprochement and, eventually, of Church unity, and consequently need to be fully and carefully addressed.

All Christians look forward to the day when Christ's Church will be visibly one. But in order for this to happen, it's necessary that there be agreement among Christians upon the apostolic Faith as the basis for that unity.

Fortunately, as Matthew Block of the Lutheran Church-Canada writes in First Things, there is another game in town: those Lutherans who share Orthodoxy's interest in doctrinal continuity with the Apostles. The International Lutheran Council (ILC), which includes the LC-C as well as the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod and a number of smaller bodies also interested in remaining faithful to the historic Christian faith, are being viewed with increasing interest by the Orthodox community as potential partners in ecumenical dialogue.

May God prosper that dialogue in its attempt to do what dialogue with liberal Protestants can never accomplish, so long as they remain liberal Protestants: a mutual witness to the truth, whose very existence Post-Modern Christianity such as that practiced by the LWF churches denies.

HT: Real Clear Religion

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…