Skip to main content

Facts are stubborn things. So is Holy Scripture.

The Reformation slogan sola Scriptura (Scripture alone) is routinely misunderstood by Roman Catholics, who think it means that there is no source of legitimate authority in the Church besides Scripture. Actually, it means that there is no source of legitimate authority of comparable stature with Scripture, and unnormed by it. The teachings of Jesus and the Apostles trump those of anybody and everybody else.

So-called "Evangelicals," whose doctrine of justification often more closely resembles that of Rome than that of the Reformation in any case, are often equally confused about the concept. For them, though, sola Scriptura too frequently means that I get to interpret Scripture all by myself, and that my interpretation is by definition as good as anybody else's.

As is so often the case, a better acquaintance with Scripture itself might help. 2 Peter 1:20-21 clearly states,

We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things. For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit (ESV).

The Modernist and Post-Modernist nonsense about truth being either unknowable or non-existent (thus making literally everything a matter of personal preference or opinion) has savaged the Christian mind as much as the secular, it seems. Truth is truth- and, as Albert Einstein once observed, "I have noticed that the universe is remarkably indifferent to my likes and dislikes."

Or, as John Adams put it, "Facts are stubborn things." Scripture means what God means, not what we want Him to mean. We are not in the position of contemporary Federal courts, rendering judgments on the basis of what we would like the law to say rather than on what it actually says. Like the universe He created, God is remarkably indifferent to what we want to be the truth. And so, we are obligated to study the Scriptures in such a way as to discover what He means to say, and not what we mean to hear. Neither is it all that difficult; God, as Paul observed, is not the Author of confusion. Where confusion arises as to the meaning of a text, it's apt to be confusion caused by our own desire to interpret it according to our own preferences rather than to any inherent lack of clarity in the text itself.

I'm currently engaged in a debate over at Facebook with a group of Arminians on one hand and Calvinists on the other about something which shouldn't really be controversial. Arminians argue- quite rightly- that God is not willing that any should perish, and has predestined nobody to hell. Calvinists, on the other hand, reply quite correctly that salvation is by grace alone- which means that it is God's election, and not our choice, decision, good works, or other merits, which form the basis of our salvation.

There seems, at first glance, to be a logical problem here. It vanishes when one takes into account Isaiah 55:

For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts (ESV).

God is not obligated to make logical sense to us. He is, after all, a great deal smarter than we are, and not subject to the limitations of human intellect. Perhaps He may condescend some day to explain this paradox to us; Luther believed that He undoubtedly would. In fact, if everything in Scripture did fit with obvious logical precision, that would be strong evidence that it was the work of mere humans who are no smarter than you or me. As it is, there was apparently Someone Whose thought processes are not identical with ours and whose capacity for thought much greater at work here.

But human pride wants to have all the answers. And so it is that Arminians and Calvinists alike- each unwilling to accept God's Word on its own terms- try to shoehorn it into an obviously consistent logical pattern accessible to their own puny human minds, and thus end up denying either that "by the works of the Law is no one justified," in the case of the Arminians, or that "God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son" in the case of the Calvinists.

Yes, facts are stubborn things. But human pride is stubborn, too.

Canadian Lutheran Matthew Block ponders the matter in First Things, and American Lutheran writer and professor Gene Veith comments.

Interestingly, Block gets sloppy and defines the sola Scriptura as Roman Catholics tend to misunderstand it. Maybe lack of precision on our part is as great as source of confusion when it comes to interpreting Scripture and expressing its doctrines as our own pride and presumption in trying to mold those doctrines to suit our own personal likes and dislikes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…