Skip to main content

Yes, we still need Neuhaus

Prof. Randy Boyagoda is right: at this time of ignorance and confused thinking in America not only religion about religion but the also about the basis of human rights, we need the thought of the late Richard John Neuhaus more than ever.

I remember once hearing Fr. Neuhaus lecture at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis. He pointed out that the most religious nation in the world is India, while the least religious is Sweden. America, Neuhaus said, "is a nation of Indians governed by Swedes- and the Indians are getting restless."

Despite all signs to the contrary, we remain a very religious people. We are also a religiously very confused people- and, to a degree unique in our history, a religiously ignorant people. Ross Douthat's Bad Religion is a superb recent book which explores that reality in depth. I wish that more people would read it.

As it is, the reality described by Neuhaus's The Naked Public Square- remains. We're a nation which continues to misunderstand and misapply our own constitutional and historical experience of a religion we have itself ceased to understand.

The public square cannot remain naked. Sectarian religion as such cannot be favored by the government, but the religious are entitled to our voice- and the Founders assumed that they would have it. Discrimination against religion is as much a violation of the First Amendment as favoritism toward it. The idea in the realm of sectarian belief is governmental neutrality.

We Christians and other religious Americans are not only entitled to our say, but the Founders counted on our having it. And history has vindicated them. We need to remind our nation that the abolition of slavery and child labor, the Civil Rights movement, and a host of other reform movements in our history have sprung precisely from religion- and that it is no sin against the First Amendment to advocate secular political reform from religious motives. In fact, to silence the voice of religion not only ignores the fact that religiously-motivated ethical and social reform can be argued from secular grounds, too- and that to deprive the public square of the imput of religion is to cut ourselves off from probably the greatest wellspring of social reform in our history, and from contact with the something very close to the heart soul of this nation and its people.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…