Skip to main content

Absolute tripe from TIME

TIME contains a remarkable piece of intellectual gibberish this week which claims that Ireland didn't reject Catholicism when it voted for gay marriage- but in fact was affirming its Catholicism when it trashed the Church's teaching on the nature of marriage and the morality of homosexual behavior.

As intellectual gymnastics go, this one is the equivalent of touching one's tailbone with one's nose. The definitive beliefs- the boundaries, if you will- of a religion are not defined by majority vote any more than truth is. In Catholicism, the boundaries are established by the magisterium; in the other Western Christian traditions, they're established by the Bible.

To reject those boundaries- as the Irish people have- is to reject the tradition. And it's worth noting that only those few, marginally Christian communities have embraced homosexuality and same-sex "marriage" which minimize or reject the authorities which supposedly set the boundaries that define their religion. I have no doubt that in many cases the stand in favor of same-sex "marriage" taken by Irish voters was based on their faith. The problem is that their faith is no longer Catholic in any meaningful sense- or even Christian.

A Catholic- or a Christian- is by definition one who accepts the teachings of Catholicism or Christianity. And the teachings of both- regardless of what a majority of those claiming identity with Catholicism or Christianity may say- unambiguously reject homosexual behavior and define marriage as being, by divine mandate, between one man and one woman.

And how's this as a nominee for the most nonsensical comment of the year: "A community which excludes anybody is no community at all."

Actually, a community which doesn't exclude a great many people is no community at all. It's the human race. it has no other boundaries than that, is totally without any particular significance, and, as a community, utterly without definition or substance.

Which is kind of the problem with cafeteria Christianity and the kind of nonsensical, brain-dead postmodern bilge the article in question is trying to sell. Words mean things, communities stand for things- and if they don't, they're nonsensical vocalizations and meaningless abstractions, not words or communities.

No doubt the Irish people did express their faith precisely through their vote. The trouble is that their faith is neither Catholic nor Christian. A faith which authorize one to discard any part of divine revelation one doesn't like is ultimately the idolatry of self, and nothing else.

HT: Real Clear Religion


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…