Skip to main content

Absolute tripe from TIME

TIME contains a remarkable piece of intellectual gibberish this week which claims that Ireland didn't reject Catholicism when it voted for gay marriage- but in fact was affirming its Catholicism when it trashed the Church's teaching on the nature of marriage and the morality of homosexual behavior.

As intellectual gymnastics go, this one is the equivalent of touching one's tailbone with one's nose. The definitive beliefs- the boundaries, if you will- of a religion are not defined by majority vote any more than truth is. In Catholicism, the boundaries are established by the magisterium; in the other Western Christian traditions, they're established by the Bible.

To reject those boundaries- as the Irish people have- is to reject the tradition. And it's worth noting that only those few, marginally Christian communities have embraced homosexuality and same-sex "marriage" which minimize or reject the authorities which supposedly set the boundaries that define their religion. I have no doubt that in many cases the stand in favor of same-sex "marriage" taken by Irish voters was based on their faith. The problem is that their faith is no longer Catholic in any meaningful sense- or even Christian.

A Catholic- or a Christian- is by definition one who accepts the teachings of Catholicism or Christianity. And the teachings of both- regardless of what a majority of those claiming identity with Catholicism or Christianity may say- unambiguously reject homosexual behavior and define marriage as being, by divine mandate, between one man and one woman.

And how's this as a nominee for the most nonsensical comment of the year: "A community which excludes anybody is no community at all."

Actually, a community which doesn't exclude a great many people is no community at all. It's the human race. it has no other boundaries than that, is totally without any particular significance, and, as a community, utterly without definition or substance.

Which is kind of the problem with cafeteria Christianity and the kind of nonsensical, brain-dead postmodern bilge the article in question is trying to sell. Words mean things, communities stand for things- and if they don't, they're nonsensical vocalizations and meaningless abstractions, not words or communities.

No doubt the Irish people did express their faith precisely through their vote. The trouble is that their faith is neither Catholic nor Christian. A faith which authorize one to discard any part of divine revelation one doesn't like is ultimately the idolatry of self, and nothing else.

HT: Real Clear Religion


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…