Skip to main content

No, cultural conservatives 'have not yet begun to fight.' The question is whether we ever will.

Another David French article from the National Review says that "Cultural Conservatives Have Not Yet Begun To Fight."

I quite agree with him (as would Luther; God is, after all, the Ruler of the Kingdom of the Left Hand,, too), and have an obligation to stand up for what is just and right even in the public arena, and even when it falls into the realm of reason rather than faith. We should fight. We have an obligation especially when the State crosses the line and begins to dictate to our consciences to utterly refuse to render unto Caesar the things that are God's.

But regrettably, there is another sense in which we cultural conservatives have not yet begun to fight. How many of us are using Firefox and/or Thunderbird? How many of us attend Disney films (the House of the Mouse cut off support from the Boy Scouts a while back because they insisted on applying sexual behavior to the category "morally straight" in dealing with appropriate conduct for Scouts). When the NFL threatened to move the last Super Bowl of Arizona's governor had signed what amounted to nothing more than a state version of the Federal law on religious freedom that passed virtually without dissent and was signed without demur by Bill Clinton, how many of us would have been prepared to give up a favorite fall and winter pastime and boycott the NFL?

When a state court forces a Christian to violate his or her conscience in the name of non-discrimination over what is, after all, a matter of behavior rather than ontological identity, how many organizations would be willing to boycott that state when it comes to conventions, business dealings, and so forth? The Left is willing to walk the walk when it comes to fighting the culture war. We are barely willing to talk the talk.

Where is the outrage when Rahm Emanuel refuses to allow Chik-fil-A to open a restaurant in Chicago because owner Dan Cathy contributed to anti-marriage definition causes? Lesbians denied a "wedding" cake they could readily have obtained elsewhere are willing to sue the baker whose conscience- rightly or wrongly- will not allow him to sell them one. Why are Christian businessmen unwilling to sue over outrages like Mayor Emanuel's abuse of power in the Chik-fil-A case?

No, cultural conservatives have not yet begun to fight. We have not been willing to stand up to the bullying, to the routine slander of our motives, to the exclusion of our arguments and our viewpoint from what passes for debate over the rash abandonment of legal and moral principles that are millennia old.

I think the question we need to ask is whether we ever are going to begin to fight- because Mr. French is right.

So far, we haven't.

And I wonder whether we ever will.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…