Skip to main content

Kim Davis should resign

Kim Davis- the Kentucky County Clerk who refuses to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples- has it wrong.

She's not wrong because she questions whether the Supreme Court may properly ignore two thousand years of precedent regarding the conjugal basis of the institution of marriage and redefine society's most basic institution on the basis of poorly-defended personal preference on the part of a majority of the Supreme Court.

She's not wrong theologically when she says that God instituted marriage as an institution involving one man and one woman, and that Anthony Kennedy does not have the authority to overrule Him.

And she's certainly not wrong when she refuses to violate her conscience by issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. But she is wrong when she tries to have her cake and eat it, too.

Rightly or wrongly (and I agree with Davis that it's wrongly), the law not only permits but mandates civil "marriage" between individuals of the same gender. And the government which has promulgated that law- however irregularly it may have done so- enjoys the status of a divine institution every bit as much as marriage does.

If Davis cannot in conscience issue marriage licenses to gay couples as her job requires her to do, the answer is not to cop out by claiming a special religious privilege excusing her from doing what her job requires. Nor is it to bring the Faith into disrepute by confusing the expectation that a public official perform the duties of her office with a requirement that she violate her conscience.

Kim Davis has no special rights by virtue of her faith, any more than an atheist or an agnostic would who chose on the basis of conscience to refuse to issue marriage licenses for church weddings. If she cannot do her job, her course should be clear.

She should resign. Doing so would be a public witness to her faith.

What she is doing now merely brings it into disrepute by providing the social and secularist Left with ammunition for the bogus charge that in insisting on religious liberty, believers are actually claiming special treatment.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…