Skip to main content

Seinfeld nails it: Don't argue with Trump. React to him by sympathizing with his pathology.

Jerry Seinfeld learned early in his career how to handle a heckler. Don't get involved in a fight with him. Become very serious, sympathize with the problems that make him act with such irrational hostility, and treat him with absolutely relentless pity.

Refuse to take him seriously.

Seinfeld- recognizing that when all is said and done Trump is merely a heckler with a lot of money and a very large audience who deals with his own insecurities by treating others in a juvenile fashion- the same way he'd treat any heckler of his nightclub act.

People react to The Donald in pretty much one of two ways. It seems from the polls that lots of people treat his childish behavior as a way of venting their own hostility and frustration with illegal immigration and pretty much any other subject Trump decides to demagogue on. The worst thing that we could do is to validate their hostility- not necessarily their concerns, but their irrational hostility- by taking Trump's seriously.

The other way people react is with frustration and anger of their own. I fall into that category. We think, "This guy is so obviously irresponsible and immature and just plain silly that it's outrageous that so many people not only take him seriously, but buy into his act!" Perhaps we comfort ourselves with the knowledge that, when all is said and done, the American people are not going to elect this bozo president. In fact, when it actually comes down to it (at the latest, after the Iowa crazies and others early in the process have had the chance to vent, but probably before even that), rank-and-file Republicans will balk at nominating a man who engages in behavior we wouldn't tolerate from our toddlers. Certainly they're not going to throw away a golden opportunity to elect a conservative president in the nick of time- while there's still an outside chance of undoing the damage Barack Obama has done to the country, to rescue our role in the world at large, and perhaps even to turn around the Supreme Court and stage a counter-offensive in the Culture Wars- just to throw a tantrum by voting for an unelectable clown like Trump.

But as Seinfeld points out, to react to Trump with anger or frustration is to take him seriously- and to take him seriously is to validate him and encourage his fellow tantrum-throwers. The country can't afford that.

Better to take Jerry's advice and treat Trump like the heckler he is. Don't get mad at him. Express concern for the hangups and insecurities which cause Trump to act in such an inappropriate fashion- and no matter how he reacts (probably by going ballistic at first, and then by sulking and finally shutting up and going away), insist on focusing on Trump's personal insecurities rather than on the nutty behavior and outrageous statements with which he gives vent to him.

Treat him like what he is, not what he'd like us to think of him as being.

Here's hoping that somebody- maybe even everybody- takes Jerry's advice at the next debate. Donald Trump has already wasted too much of our time with his juvenile antics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…