Skip to main content

From the Battle of Lepanto to the Synod at Rome

Also Sprach Benedict XVI about “respect for that which another group holds sacred, especially respect for the sacred in the highest sense, for God, which one can reasonably expect to find even among those who are not willing to believe in God:"

When this respect is violated in a society, something essential is lost. In European society today, thank goodness, anyone who dishonors the faith of Israel, its image of God, or its great figures must pay a fine. The same holds true for anyone who dishonors the Koran and the convictions of Islam. But when it comes to Jesus Christ and that which is sacred to Christians, freedom of speech becomes the supreme good. This case illustrates a peculiar Western self-hatred that is nothing short of pathological. It is commendable that the West is trying to be more open, to be more understanding of the values of outsiders, but it has lost all capacity for self-love. All that it sees in its own history is the despicable and the destructive; it is no longer able to perceive what is great and pure. . . . Multiculturalism teaches us to approach the sacred things of others with respect, but we can do this only if we ourselves are not estranged from the sacred, from God.

Now, as much as I respect the Pope Emeritus, I emphatically disagree with him that people who slander Judaism or Islam- or, for that matter, Christianity- should pay a fine. Europeans (and Canadians) tend not to "get" freedom of speech, and the damage done to freedom when even "hate speech" is prescribed rather than disapproved of. Saying malicious things about other people's religions is something one ought not to do, and when one does, he or she should face the disapproval of the group. But taking it a step further and criminalizing speech crosses a line which cannot be effectively redrawn. If one can be fined for criticizing or even demeaning someone else's religion, what about their politics? Their hairstyle? Their taste in music? Respect for others is a matter of good manners and civility. It cannot be coerced without destroying freedom itself.

But nevertheless, the former pontiff has a valid point. In Europe, even more than on this side of the pond, there's a double-standard where religion is concerned. Somehow Christianity stands alone as the one belief system which need not be respected.

Nicholas Frankovich of the National Review reminds us of the recent 444th anniversary of the Battle of Lepanto, in which the Holy League organized by Pope Pius V defeated the Ottoman Turks and secured the independence of Christian Europe.

Now, he points out, the Pope has summoned his legions in a very different war: that against ethical apostacy, sexual licence, and the assault of a hostile Western world on Christian values.

He seems, Mr. Frankovich observes, to have summoned them not to battle, but to surrender- surrender at a moment at which Christians in the Middle East are facing persecution by Muslims and have nowhere to flee but a Europe increasingly under threat of conquest by Islam once again.

No Pius. No Benedict. How, indeed, the barque of Peter has drifted.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…