Skip to main content

You can lead a horse to water...

Dealing with all of the heresy and deceit in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America  during my years in the parish was emotionally draining I used to feel sorry for myself a lot. And then one year at the theological conference I attended in Chicago each year, a pastor from the State Church of Sweden spoke- and I realized that even with all the nonsense which just about defined the ELCA, I had it a great deal better than confessional pastors in Scandinavia.

Traditionally Lutherans decide with whom to practice intercommunion, common worship, and other forms of fellowship with on the basis of public doctrine. It is assumed that a person will not affiliate with a church body with whose official teachings he or she disagrees. Of course, that is not always the case. But the assumption is that it should be. The church one attends is, after all, a public confession that one shares the beliefs of that church. Where this is not the case, the confession being made by attending it is at best confused and confusing to others. At worst, it's seen as dishonest.

So fellowship is practiced (or not) on the basis of the official doctrine of a church body. Individuals don't simply decide that they're comfortable receiving Communion at a certain congregation of another church body- or at least, they shouldn't, in the Lutheran view. Doing so, after all, constitutes a public endorsement of that congregation's confession- and that confession is assumed to be reflected in the confession of the church body with which it is affiliated.

"Pulpit and altar fellowship" is a big deal for Lutherans (or at least for those Lutherans whose theological presuppositions are still in line with those of Luther, the Lutheran Confessions, and Lutheran custom and tradition). Nominally Lutheran churches like the ELCA or most of the other denominations which comprise the Lutheran World Federation, of course, aren't very big on doctrine in any case, and tend to commune pretty much anybody. In fact, the ELCA recently adopted a policy of even admitting non-Christians to communion at its altars.

Why would a Buddhist or a Hindu want to commune at an ELCA altar? Good question. But the fact that the ELCA invites them to do so is evidence that the significance of the Sacrament is not high on their list of priorities. Which is why I could not possibly receive Communion in an ELCA church, despite the fact that, being a member of species Homo sapiens, I would be welcome to do so.

At last report, there is no discussion in the ELCA about admitting members of other species to the Sacrament, though literally nothing that denomination might do would surprise me at this point.

During my years in the ELCA, I found that making the good confession was a lonely business. I tried to do my duty and warn my congregations of what was happening. On one hand, they thanked me for standing up for what they, too, believed. But on the other, they refused to act on what I was telling them, or to fight back.

I was one of a very small number of pastors who stood up and objected as the church was carefully and deliberately guided away from biblical and Lutheran teaching on everything from human sexuality to the doctrine of justification. There were always people willing to tell me privately how much they appreciated my efforts. But for some reason, they themselves remained silent. When, at last, my Synod Assembly voted not to include equal representation on a committee examining the position of the church on homosexuality for representatives of what was still at that point the actual teaching of the church, I had enough. I stood up and told the Assembly exactly what I thought of their nonsense, and walked out.

The bishop responded with courtesy, sympathy, and expressions of sadness at my response. Many of the delegates did what they usually did when someone objected to abject apostasy: they laughed at me.

But it took half an hour for me to get out of the hall. People kept stopping me and telling me that they agreed with me and asking me not to leave. But they themselves remained silent. They enabled the apostasy with their offerings and made it possible for it to continue by remaining quiet.

I have to admit that since then I've had little sympathy for those who told me that they intended to "stay in the ELCA and fight-" but who hadn't done a lick of fighting then, and in most cases haven't since. Yes, I felt that they had let me down by letting me stand up alone and take the heat while they stayed silent. More to the point, however, I felt that the were letting Christ down by their continued silence and that their passivity deprived them of any right to complain.

That was judgemental if me. Some have done a great deal of fighting since, although the fighting was usually done far too late and in far too uncoordinated and sporadic way to have had an impact. The ELCA's apostasy on the question of human sexuality resulted in enough congregations and individuals leaving it to form two entirely new church bodies. Even now, sound, confessional pastors and congregations and individual lay people remain in the ELCA, often not reflecting on the fact that by doing so they continue to enable those who have led it astray to take it even further astray.

Gene Veith recently spent some time in Scandanavia, where the faithful individuals in largely unfaithful churches don't have the options we do. In many cases, the Lutheran churches in Scandanavia are state churches. The option to leave and find a congregation or church body more in tune with their convictions just isn't there.

So they endure somehow, often under harassment and even persecution of apostate hierarchies much, much farther gone than even the ELCA.

Dr. Veith asks what we can do to support those folks. How do we reconcile our tradition of taking one's public confession seriously with the fact that so many of our brothers and sisters over there have no choice but to remain in apostate churches with which biblical and confessional Lutherans cannot be in public fellowship? Is there room, somehow, for fellowship with districts and congregations and individuals who share our confession but remain within heterodox church bodies? Traditionally. confessional Lutherans have said no to "selective fellowship." But given the dimensions of the current worldwide apostasy, is it time to reexamine that position?

I have no doubt that I have allowed by own personal hurt and sense of abandonment to cause me to be a great deal less charitable to those sound Christians who incomprehensibly have chosen to remain in a church body they know to be apostate than I should have. I have some repenting of my own to do. And some thinking.

I don't know. What can we do to support those folks- folks who remain content to stand by even now and refuse to help themselves,  or perhaps don't know what to do?

Something. I wish I knew what.

Comments

El Cid said…
As always, an excellent and thought provoking article and view point. I was hoping that someone would comment with the answer to your question. I wish I had one.

I sit here in America, literally in the lap of luxury, knowing that our Christian brothers and sisters are being murdered and enslaved in much of the world. And in most of the rest of the world, the are ridiculed, mocked, and marginalized. Yet, most of us in relatively free and prosperous countries choose to either ignore this dilemma or passively hope things get better.

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…