Skip to main content

'What do we want?' 'Free stuff!' 'Who's gonna give it to us?' 'The government!' 'Who's going to pay for it?' 'The One Percent!' "What can't we do? 'Basic arithmetic!'

Right now, we're running a catastrophic 18 trillion dollar deficit. If all of Bernie Sanders' proposals were implimented, they would cost another 18 trillion.

How to pay for it? Easy Soak the rich. Make that demonic "One Percent" step up to the plate and pay its "fare share!"

Except that the top 50% of all taxpayers currently pay 97.2% of all Federal income taxes; the top one percent pay 38.1%, and the bottom 90% pay 29.7%. Which is as it should be. The principle of a graduated income tax has behind it the reasonable idea that the burden of paying for the work of the Federal government should lay most heavily upon the shoulders of those best able to bear that burden. But on the other hand, when one percent of the population pays 38.1% of the taxes, it's hard to make the case that they're not carrying much more than ther weight!

Sorry, Mike Huckabee and all you Flat Tax advocates, but it's a matter of simple fairness.

But what happens when you point those statistics out to a "progressive?" Invariably he or she will simply refuse to accept them, and will consider that an adequate response to them. Like the ostrich sticking its head in the sand, they seem to think that if they deny reality it will obligingly go away. Except, of course, that the world doesn't work that way. Unless you're a Christian Scientist (or a Democrat), it's patent that reality doesn't care very much one way or the other about whether one acknowledges it.

Reality says that the Left's numbers when it comes to soaking the rich almost never add up. And it also says that somebody will still have to pay for all those goodies. Therein lies the problem. As Margarent Thatcher pointed out, the problem with looking to the government to provide for every aspect of your life is that "sooner or later you run out of other people's money!"

The response of the woman in the video below upon being confronted with the economic facts of life is fairly typical of the response of "progressives" generally to having their wholly imaginary "reality" challeged by mere facts.

Mrs. Thatcher was right. Eventually you do run out of other people's money, and it is simply not true that the resources of the "one percent" are either infinite or sufficient to pay for all the goodies the Left keeps thinking they can be made to pay for.

And another thing: when tax rates reach a certain level for the rich, it will no longer make sense to become rich. What, after all, is the practical difference between having one cookie and having ten if having ten means that nine of them are going to be taken away from you? And if the percentage of the cookies you are allowed to keep keeps dropping the more cookies you have, there comes a point at which you gain nothing by baking any more.

Among the probems this creates is that you no longer have people to take cookies from to give to the cookie-deprived. Everybody goes hungry.

But what does that matter? Those greedy SOB's don't have more cookies than we do anymore!

A word of warning: watching this video will be painful. As Herman Cain points out, as ridiculous and foolish as this young woman's position is, nobody should be embarassed this way, especially on national TV.

But on the other hand, at some point somebody has to break it to the "progressives" that in the real world all those goodies have to be paid for- and the One Percent can't even begin to pay for them.

And neither can the rest of us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…