Skip to main content

Left-wing garbage in, left-wing garbage out

Ever since homosexuality became a supposed civil rights issue, scientific findings which have long been universally accepted have suddenly been overturned, often on the basis of very suspicious new studies. Qualms about them are essentially drowned out by a chorus of adulation from scientists and journalists who are politically gratified by the new results.

At the same time, studies which contradict political orthodoxy are subjected to a level of criticism which inevitably fulfills its objective of finding some far less serious flaw to serve as a basis of loud and resounding rejection. Science has to an unconscionable extent ceased to be science and become propaganda, while peeer review has become an arena not for the objective analysis of methodology but for the discrediting of political heresy.

As a result, the very source of science's authority- its laser-like focus on the facts precisely regardless of our personal attitudes and prejudices- has been subverted. It's fasciating, for example, that according to current theory there are (not insurmountable) developmental problems associated with growing up in a home without an opposite-sex parent- unless both of one's parents are gay! The same is true of studies in various other sciences, both "hard" and "soft."

Gene Veith has a good post on the problem of phony and non-reproducible results from Left-leaning psychological and sociological studies. As I've said many times, the faith of people who actually think about such things rather than exhibiting a sheeplike acceptance of whatever "authority" tells them in science is under severe challenge from the amount of propaganda masquerading as science these days- and obligingly accepted as such by the media.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…