Skip to main content

Ok, I'm ready. I'm switching to Marco Rubio.

Just got home from hearing two U.S. Senators who are small in stature but big in every way that counts,

As readers of this blog know, I have a great deal of respect for Joni Ernst, the conservative ELCA Lutheran who is my junior U.S. Senator and for whose election I worked two years ago. Joni introduced Marco Rubio today. She declined to actually endorse him- she's promised not to endorse anybody prior to the Caucuses- but she came pretty close. Sen. Ernst, the only female combat veteran in Congress, emphasized his tough and well-informed national security positions and his strength on defense issues.

Rubio- who is probably a more inspiring speaker than any presidential candidate I've heard since Jack Kennedy- spoke of being a child of immigrants who is in favor of immigration but thinks that there have to be consequences for breaking any of our laws. He talked of the need, not to "degrade" ISIS, but to destroy it. He promised to abrogate the deal with Iran on his first day in office. He said that anybody in the VA who wasn't doing his job would be fired under a Rubio administration and that he would support legislation to enable vets to receive medical care from the doctors and at the hospitals of their choice.

Barack Obama ran, he said, promising not to fix America's problems, but to "change" it into something it wasn't. It's time, he said, to change it back. He said that Hillary Clinton has disqualified herself from being president by her reckless use of her personal email account for classified material, exposing our secrets to our enemies. He said that Bernie Sanders would make a fine president- of Sweden.  He spoke of protecting the Second Amendment but didn't imply that guns are harmless toys with nerf bullets. And he pointed out that while he was eager to run against Hillary Clinton, she isn't so eager to run against him.

Which is a telling point. Rubio is the candidate the Democrats fear most. The polls have consistently shown him to be Hillary's toughest opponent, and the one with the best chance to beat her. And as he pointed out, given the vacancies that are going to be occurring on the Supreme Court in the next four years, she must be beaten.

Either Trump or Cruz would lose to her in a landslide, Rand Paul- whose weak-kneed defense posture was also the subject of a few shots from the Florida senator, although he never mentioned him by name- would do no better. Kasich, Christie, and I'm very much afraid Jeb Bush have, like Paul, no realistic chance of being nominated.

Marco Rubio is the GOP's strongest candidate. With a foot in both the Tea Party and the Establishment camps, he's almost certainly the only candidate who could unite the party rather than split it, possibly forever.

He emphasized that he was the child of immigrants, and like Joni grew up in poverty. America, he said is the greatest nation in the history of the human race. America owes him nothing, he said- but he owes America everything.  And he promised to keep it great and make the 21st Century, rather than the 20th, its finest.

Donald Trump is a demagogue, an egomaniac, and a buffoon.  Ted Cruz comes from the juvenile wing of the Republican party, the one that joins Barack Obama in insisting on its own way and refusing to compromise- but is so inept at it that it gets the Republicans blamed for the resulting gridlock while Obama gets off scot free.

Marco Rubio is a grownup, and he's a serious candidate with a legitimate chance of being nominated and the best chance of any Republican of being elected. Despite my continued respect for Jeb Bush, the most qualified candidate in either party to actually be president, Rubio is the only candidate acceptable to me who actually has a chance.

It is not lightly, but with a strong conviction that it's the right decision, that I've committed to supporting Marco Rubio in the Iowa Republican Caucuses on February 1.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…