Skip to main content

Ted Cruz: poster child for everything that's broken in American politics

Ted Cruz is betting the farm- and America's future- on the extremely dubious premise that there are enough hard-core conservatives or, at least, people sympathetic to hard-conservatism to win a national election.

It's a common delusion on the hard Right. It has been for years, no matter how many polls and how many elections disprove it. America is a crazy quilt of social liberalism, theoretical fiscal conservatism, vague libertarianism, and a kind of fuzzy, mindlessly emotional approach to issues to which Cruz or someone like him might appeal in some ways, but which he would alienate in far more.

The really telling point is that Americans have generally given Congress a favorability rating below 20% since time nearly immemorial for one basic reason: its inability to compromise and get anything done. Both parties are guilty of this. Regrettably, though, Republicans- and Ted Cruz, preeminently- have gone out of their way to do it, and to do it in such a way that they, rather than President Obama and the Democrats, will be blamed by the American people for the resulting gridlock.

Threatening someone at gunpoint doesn't work very well if you have the gun aimed at your own head. Somehow, Ted Cruz has never learned this.

Cruz is the poster child for non-compromise. He was willing to shut the government down over funding for Planned Parenthood that had no chance of final passage in any case. His combative partisanship lacks the slickness and sophistication of Barack Obama's As a result, when the gridlock which has hobbled Congress for so long gets interpreted by the American voter, it gets interpreted- and generally not without reason- as the result of the unreasonableness of Republicans like Cruz rather than of Democrats like Obama. Few Americans are gullible enough to buy the reasoning that says that when parents fail to meet a kidnapper's ransom demands and the kidnapper kills the victim, the parents rather than the kidnapper are to blame.

Ted Crus is, in the most literal possible sense, the poster child for everything about the government that angers the average American. Donald Trump is unelectable because he's ignorant, arrogant, unstable, ill-informed, erratic, impulsive, and a clown. Ted Cruz is a more serious candidate- almost anybody would be- but he, too, is unelectable because when the American people look at him, conservatism- a minority ideology in any case- is not going to be what they see.

What they see will be a political terrorist, a person who was willing to shut down the government over a rhetorical point. They will see a fanatic- somebody who, as Winston Churchill once said, "can't change his mind and won't change the subject."

The American people don't elect such folks president- at least without a great more charm and sleazy charisma than Ted Cruz has. Like Trump, Cruz is a certain loser.

A vote for either of these men in next week's Iowa Caucuses, or in any subsequent caucus or primary, is effectively a vote for Hillary Clinton- or whoever the Democrats ultimately find to run in her place.

This is an election the Republicans ought to win. But by nominating either Trump or Cruz, they guarantee that they will lose it.

Photo By DonkeyHotey via


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

A third party President in 2020?

I had the pleasure of meeting Joel Searsby, the campaign manager for Evan McMullin last year, at an event for Evan here in Des Moines during the campaign. Here's an interview with Joel by Jon Ward of Yahoo News on the ways in which centrist French President Emmanuel Marcon's out-of-nowhere landslide election last year may serve as an example for the inevitable bid to elect a rational, moderate third party candidate in 2020.

I have a feeling that it will be Evan McMullin again. But names like John Kasich, the Governor of Ohio, and Sen. Lindsey Graham also keep popping up. Word is that Kasich may challenge President Trump for the 2020 Republican nomination, an endeavor in which I'd wish him well but hold out very, very little hope for his success. I sadly expect that my conviction that the Republicans are dead as a vehicle for rationality and the reuniting of our fractured and divided country to be confirmed by the easy renomination of the most unfit and unqualified preside…