Skip to main content

The Left and the sudden outbreak of MTDS

In the first eight years of the past decade,  observers with any hint of objectivity were bemused by the appearance of a strange mental aberration among people whose politics were somewhat to the Left of Center.

"Bush Derangement Syndrome," it was called. Its chief symptom was a fanatical, seemingly uncontrollable and wholly irrational hatred of George W. Bush and all his works by otherwise normal and reasonable people. They could be perfectly sane on every other subject. But let Dubya be mentioned, and the fire of fanaticism would appear in the eyes of victims, and they would begin to foam at the mouth. No matter what the subject, and no matter how trivial the matter, they would begin to rave and curse and carry on about Laura's hubby and hurl all matter of malicious nonsense about him in all directions. It was often quite embarrassing for bystanders.

Later, some observed a similar phenomenon called "Obama Derangement Syndrome." The differential diagnosis in each case was simple disagreement with the policies of the incumbent president. The diagnosis of BDS or ODS could be made, however, on the basis of the vehemence,  irrationality and outright malice involved, often coupled with a contrast with the ordinary personality of the victim.

As the canonization of Mother Teresa of Calcutta approaches, a similar phenomenon has appeared on the Left. If ever there was an icon of selfless and heroic service to the poor, it was that remarkable nun who worked in the slums of one of the world's most impoverished cities. But suddenly, an epidemic of Mother Teresa Derangement Syndrome has broken out.

While there's been some carping about the "haphazard" quality of the medical care she provided to those who otherwise would have had none, the actual vector of MTDS seems to be her opposition to abortion. Imagine: a Catholic nun opposed to abortion! Imagine: the Roman church about to canonize somebody who upheld its teaching on the subject!

Imagine: somebody daring to hold an opinion at odds with the orthodoxy of the totalitarian Left! But as Richard Hutchinson points out, her actual crime was repeatedly confronting the hypocrisy of people who liked to think of themselves as Catholics or Christians or even people who were basically humanitarian with the incompatibility of abortion with anything remotely humane or even human.

One the Left cannot forgive is being forced to face up to its own phoniness. But in the spirit of Mother Teresa, let's be charitable and say that  it's to the credit of at least some of them that their hearts remain sufficiently uncalloused that they feel the need to be defensive about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…