Skip to main content

Five new South Carolina polls

Five new polls are out in advance of Saturday's Republican primary in South Carolina:

Trump 36%
Cruz 17%
Rubio 15%
Bush 13%
Carson 9%
Kasich 7%

SC House
Trump 35%
Cruz 16%
Rubio 16%
Bush 14%
Kasich 9%
Carson 6%

Trump 35%
Cruz 19%
Rubio 17%
Kasich 9%
Bush 8%

Trump 35%
Cruz 20%
Rubio 19%
Bush 9%
Kasich 9%
Carson 5%

Trump 35%
Cruz 18%
Rubio 18%
Kasich 10%
Bush 7%
Carson 7%

The SC House poll is probably the most reliable, being based on a sample of 2400 likely voters with only a two percent margin of error. The PPP poll is based on a sample of 897 likely voters with a 3.3% margin of error. All of the others are samples of between 375 and 502 likely voters, with margins of error between four and five percent.

All of them project Trump winning handily, with Cruz and Rubio in a tight race for second. Thereafter they differ greatly, and in important ways.

The SC House poll shows a virtual three-way tie for second place with Cruz, Rubio and Bush all within the margin of error. Such a result would do little to accomplish what the "sane lane" needs to accomplish, and as quickly as possible: to have Rubio, Bush or Kasich (most likely Rubio) emerge as its consensus candidate, with the other two withdrawing and endorsing him. If anything like the SC House poll is what the returns look like on Saturday night, we'll have to wait until Super Tuesday on March 1 for any movement toward that happening. And if the process takes longer than that, it might be too late. The battle might end up coming down to Trump and Cruz, with Trump having a big advantage.

The second biggest poll- the PPP poll- shows Bush tied for last place with Ben Carson. If that happens, and Kasich is ten full points behind Rubio, a strong case could be made that Rubio would have the "sane lane" all but wrapped up, and barring a stellar showing by either Bush or Kasich (more likely Kasich) on Super Tuesday should, if Bush and Kasich think of the party and the country first, move on from there into what figures to be a fairly even three-way race between Trump, Cruz and Rubio with the strong possibility of a brokered convention in Cleveland. If that happens, Rubio would be the most likely of the three to emerge as the nominee.

Bloomberg's model is similar to that of SC House while Emerson's and Monmouth's foreshadow Rubio emerging in an even more dominant position than does the PPP poll. The story in South Carolina will be which of the two models prevails- a virtual knockout third or even second place finish for Rubio with Bush and Kasich back in the pack, or a close race between two or even all three of the "sane lane" candidates preventing Rubio from establishing himself as the strongest of the three going into the Nevada Caucuses on February 23 and Super Tuesday on March 1.

If the former there is a good chance that Trump can be stopped. If the latter, it still could happen- but those of us who are fearful of a Trump nomination will have cause to begin to worry.


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…