Skip to main content

Five new South Carolina polls

Five new polls are out in advance of Saturday's Republican primary in South Carolina:

Trump 36%
Cruz 17%
Rubio 15%
Bush 13%
Carson 9%
Kasich 7%

SC House
Trump 35%
Cruz 16%
Rubio 16%
Bush 14%
Kasich 9%
Carson 6%

Trump 35%
Cruz 19%
Rubio 17%
Kasich 9%
Bush 8%

Trump 35%
Cruz 20%
Rubio 19%
Bush 9%
Kasich 9%
Carson 5%

Trump 35%
Cruz 18%
Rubio 18%
Kasich 10%
Bush 7%
Carson 7%

The SC House poll is probably the most reliable, being based on a sample of 2400 likely voters with only a two percent margin of error. The PPP poll is based on a sample of 897 likely voters with a 3.3% margin of error. All of the others are samples of between 375 and 502 likely voters, with margins of error between four and five percent.

All of them project Trump winning handily, with Cruz and Rubio in a tight race for second. Thereafter they differ greatly, and in important ways.

The SC House poll shows a virtual three-way tie for second place with Cruz, Rubio and Bush all within the margin of error. Such a result would do little to accomplish what the "sane lane" needs to accomplish, and as quickly as possible: to have Rubio, Bush or Kasich (most likely Rubio) emerge as its consensus candidate, with the other two withdrawing and endorsing him. If anything like the SC House poll is what the returns look like on Saturday night, we'll have to wait until Super Tuesday on March 1 for any movement toward that happening. And if the process takes longer than that, it might be too late. The battle might end up coming down to Trump and Cruz, with Trump having a big advantage.

The second biggest poll- the PPP poll- shows Bush tied for last place with Ben Carson. If that happens, and Kasich is ten full points behind Rubio, a strong case could be made that Rubio would have the "sane lane" all but wrapped up, and barring a stellar showing by either Bush or Kasich (more likely Kasich) on Super Tuesday should, if Bush and Kasich think of the party and the country first, move on from there into what figures to be a fairly even three-way race between Trump, Cruz and Rubio with the strong possibility of a brokered convention in Cleveland. If that happens, Rubio would be the most likely of the three to emerge as the nominee.

Bloomberg's model is similar to that of SC House while Emerson's and Monmouth's foreshadow Rubio emerging in an even more dominant position than does the PPP poll. The story in South Carolina will be which of the two models prevails- a virtual knockout third or even second place finish for Rubio with Bush and Kasich back in the pack, or a close race between two or even all three of the "sane lane" candidates preventing Rubio from establishing himself as the strongest of the three going into the Nevada Caucuses on February 23 and Super Tuesday on March 1.

If the former there is a good chance that Trump can be stopped. If the latter, it still could happen- but those of us who are fearful of a Trump nomination will have cause to begin to worry.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…