Skip to main content

Is somebody doesn't put this out there now, Hillary will this Fall.

I do not post this lightly. If the media were doing their job, I wouldn't have to post it at all. I do so because I think it raises reasonable questions, not because I suggest any particular conclusions- at least as regards the psychiatric end of things.

I'm not a psychologist, and I don't play one on TV. But some folks are.  And when enough of them say the same thing, I think it's time to pay attention.

Read this.

And this.

And this.

And this.

And this.

There are plenty more. Just do a Google search on the words Donald Trump and Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Once more, I'm not a psychologist, and I'm not qualified to diagnose Donald Trump. I've never even met Donald Trump. But when so many people who are qualified write that a man who is the presidential front-runner of one of the major parties exhibits behaviors typical of someone suffering from a mental disorder which can be extremely dangerous in someone who holds political power, the matter merits careful consideration.

Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Joseph Mengele, Idi Amin, Ted Bundy, Saddam Hussein, Lee Harvey Oswald, O.J. Simpson, and Marilyn Manson are thought by some to have suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The same is true of fascist poet Ezra Pound, Mao Tse Tung and Pol Pot.

Now, in fairness, behaviors typical of NPD have also been ascribed to relatively benign personalities like Madonna, Opera Winfrey, Jenny McCarthy, Suzanne Sommers, Justin Bieber, Tom Cruise, and the Kardashians. Also, Charlie Chaplain (!), Christiaan Barnard (!), Marlon Brando, Warren Beatty, William Shatner, Ryan O'Neal, Alec Baldwin, Sharon Stone, Elvis Presley, Joan Crawford, Pablo Picasso, Ike Turner, Kayne West, Eva Peron, Simon Cowell, and Liberace.

And Donald Trump.

Now,  not all narcissists have a personality disorder. Not all narcissists are dangerous. Gene Wilder believes that you have to be something of a narcissist in order to be an actor; politicians and even clergy  choose  professions in which they're the center of attention, and which probably contain more than their share of narcissists.  Having been a minister, it would appear that I must have a touch of narcissism in me; I have to admit that I do enjoy being the center of attention! Only a professional is qualified to diagnose actual NPD. And it should be emphasized that even the professionals cited above have never had Donald Trump as a patient, and thus are not in a position to make a formal diagnosis.

But the stakes are high. The risks of having a person with NPD as President of the United States are enormous. A lack of empathy for others is dangerous in a president. So is a tendency to make bold and impulsive decisions regardless of the consequences for other people. So is a refusal to be accountable. So is finding defeat and even criticism not only distasteful but intolerable. Above all, so is lacking  the healthy self-doubt which causes most of us to at least consider the possibility that we could be wrong.

Here is an interesting consideration of the relationship between narcissism and related personality characteristics and tyranny. And here is an interesting page which provides some background on the subject of narcissism.

I do not claim that Donald Trump has NPD.  I mean to imply nothing other than that, given his personality, a reasonable degree of caution is in order. I have my own opinion of The Donald's fitness for the presidency, which is emphatically not based on medical criteria, but on my observations of his character and his behavior with reference to history, and especially to one particular historical figure.

And I am not the only person who sees a parallel between Donald Trump's personality and that of one particular historical figure from Italy.

I commend this article to you. The author reaches pretty much the same conclusions I have, and for pretty similar reasons.

I personally don't want Donald Trump's finger anywhere near the nuclear button.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…