Skip to main content

Maybe it's too early to panic

Here's another view of the Republican race at this stage, from National Review.

To some extent. it refutes the pessimism of my last post on the race. There are some convincing statistics here on the difficulty Trump will have in achieving a majority of convention delegates before April at least- and maybe even afterward. It's certainly the case that many commentators are missing the point that Trump is getting only about a third of the vote in the primaries and caucuses, but needs one more than half of the delegates to be nominated at Cleveland,

That's possible but difficult. Several states do have "winner take all" primaries. But the next of those are Marco Rubio's home state of Florida and John Kasich's home state of Ohio on March 15 (Missouri's,  also on March 15,  is "winner take all" only if a candidate receives more than 50% of the vote, which no one will this year).

Well, yes. Ok. The North Mariana Islands Caucuses on March 15 are also 'winner take all," but winning them won't get Trump much closer to that majority since the North Marianans only have nine delegates to award.

Cruz's Texas  holds its primary on March 1. Trump is not going to run the table in March,  and it will be a while before winning "winner take all" primaries is going to help him translate a third of the votes into a majority of the delegates.

But what happens if Trump wins Florida, or Ohio, or Texas? Obviously the favorite son of that state- Rubio, Kasich, or Cruz- would be badly hurt. But another intriguing possibility arises from that (unlikely) event.

If Kasich loses Ohio- or even if he doesn't do as well as he expects in Illinois and Michigan and the other larger, less conservative states- he still may do as the National Review article predicts, and stay in the race in order to be a power broker at what may be the first convention since 1952 at which the nominee is still in doubt at the opening gavel.  Or realizing that there is a danger that Trump might have it wrapped up before the election,  Kasich might withdraw,  leaving the "sane lane" to Rubio.

And here's another, even more, intriguing possibility. As South Carolina demonstrated, Cruz isn't going to do nearly as well among Southern evangelicals- and therefore in the South as a whole- as he hoped. What if, realizing that he wasn't going to be the nominee but that Trump, with whom he has been feuding so bitterly, was probably going to be, Cruz pulled out- making the balance of the race essentially mano-a-mano between Trump and Rubio?

Here's the thing: One-on-one against any of the other candidates, Trump loses. He has done as well as he has done not because he's a strong candidate- strong candidates get better than a third of the votes- but because he's had so many opponents.

Ok, concern is appropriate at this stage. But Il Duce isn't a sure thing yet. Not by a long shot.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…