Skip to main content

Conservatives pushing independent race by Condi Rice

I've blogged before on how Sen. Ben Sasse and other conservative Republicans, faced with the disaster for the conservative movement and the country inherent in the nomination of Donald Trump by the GOP, are casting about for a candidate to run as the head of a temporary third party movement.

A group of wealthy conservative contributors who share the same goals but are not necessarily working in concert with them have settled on former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice.

The case for Condi is easy to see. She certainly has the gravitas to make the race, and foreign policy chops like nobody else in either party. Having been a much better Secretary of State than Hillary Clinton (no private email servers or screwups like Benghazi) she would outflank Hillary on that front. Being a woman she would steal some of Hillary's thunder on the gender issue as well.

And she's an African-American. She's polling in the 10%-25% range with Hispanic and African-American voters. That would hurt Hillary badly.

On most issues she is so clearly more conservative than Donald Trump that, combined with her YUGE superiority in qualifications,  it isn't clear that Trump wouldn't meet the fate of the last Republican nominee to face a third-party revolt, William Howard Taft, and end up finishing third because of defections from his own party's ranks.

The negatives: Condi is pro-choice and- while I don't know this for certain- I'm pretty sure she's also pro-marriage redefinition. Her selections for the Supreme Court might not what they would have to be if the Constitution was going to be saved. On the other hand, options are limited, and I'd trust her more than Hillary or The Donald.

She's also reluctant to run.

Those in back of the movement to draft Condi say that she's the only potential third-party candidate who polls well enough to be viable. Perhaps, but faced with the certainty of a race between Trump and Hillary that could change- especially if Hillary is Hillary and Trump is unable to contain his inner Trumpness. He will doubtless try. He is probably regretting many of the things he said earlier in the campaign when he didn't really think he'd be the nominee. At the same time, his continuing belittling remarks about Marco Rubio and others have shown beyond doubt that uniting the party is going to be beyond him.

With both major party candidates vulnerable, the right third-party candidate might even win. I have enormous respect for Dr. Rice, even though her positions on social issues are unacceptable to me. But if the choices are Clinton, Trump, and Rice, it wouldn't be a difficult choice.

With however many reservations, I'd still vote for Condi. After all, she'd be the only one of the three options I respect.

Graphic by DonkeyHotey

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…