Skip to main content

"Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer, do... Am I crazy? Guess what I just might do!"

Donald Trump says that he won't rule out the use of nuclear weapons against ISIS because we need to be unpredictable.

Just let that sink in for a moment. He wants us to be unpredictable. The Donald wants the world to think that the President of the United States might do something that only a madman would even consider.

Let's be clear about this. No sane person would ever even consider using nukes against ISIS- thereby killing exponentially more innocent people than terrorists, contaminating the whole region, and risking all sorts of other ramifications from nuclear powers and just plain friendly countries whose people would be poisoned by the fallout. Is The Donald seriously suggesting that he wants to leave the impression in the minds of the world that he's crazier than a boiled owl? Because he's succeeding! The world already sees him as at best a clown and at worst a bigoted madman.

The guy is so transparently an ignoramus and a buffoon that the inability of so many who have voted in the Republican primaries to see it is not only puzzling but bizarre. Ok, people are angry. But do they really think that putting a narcissistic ignoramus in the White House who wants the world to think that he's bonkers is the solution?

This isn't Iowa or New Hampshire anymore. Trump is closing in on the Republican nomination. In 1964, Barry Goldwater suggested that maybe we should consider using nukes in Vietnam. The Democrats ran the following ad:



It only ran once. That's all it needed to run.

Lyndon Johnson carried 44 states and the District of Columbia.

Donald Trump is already destined for a landslide defeat, so in one sense it hardly matters. But dudes......are you crazy, too?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…