Skip to main content

Our crazy nominating system- and Trump as a horrible accident

There can be no doubt that our system for nominating candidates for president is kinda weird. One reason why it's even weirder than it needs to be is that candidates who run for president aren't necessarily really running for president.

Here's a great article by former U.S. Senator Jim Talent (R-Minn) about what's really going on this year- and how you can't always avoid getting what you don't want. It also does a wonderful job of explaining the otherwise inexplicable phenomenon of Donald Trump.

As anyone who has even glanced at this blog knows, it would be difficult to imagine a degree of contempt for a public figure who isn't a mass murderer or the literal Antichrist much greater than that I feel for the Trumpmeister. But reading the article has convinced me that in one sense maybe it's a little- just a little, mind you- excessive. Donald Trump may be a clown, but now that I think about it some, he can't be the total idiot he appears to be. Nobody with the smarts to accomplish what Trump has accomplished (however little it may be compared to what he's like you to think he's accomplished, or what his supporters think he has accomplished) would have said the kind of things he's said, done the kind of things he's done, or been nearly so sloppy in the policy department if he'd actually been trying to become president of the United States.

I'm frankly a little annoyed with myself for not having thought of this before, but what if Trump is running for president merely as an exercise in self-promotion and never expected to win, or even come close? What if all this is simply an ego trip that got out of hand?

What if the Donald is as surprised-and shocked- as the rest of us? It would certainly explain a great deal that otherwise is inexplicable in this nuttiest and most nationally embarrassing of election years.

Graphic by DonkeyHotey


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…