Skip to main content

So where do we go from Cleveland?

Ross Douthat herein lays out the various possible scenarios for Trumpism after November.

He'ls less pessimistic in some ways than I am. He thinks the GOP may survive in a perpetual state of civil war,   or else suffer a merely tmporary schism. He is probably right in saying, as I observed yesterday, that the breakup of the Republican party would probably mean a generation of Democratic governance, just as the split of the Canadian Progressive Conservatives and the Reform party led to a decade of Liberal governments, and ended only with their reunion into the present Conservative party.

But there is no way that a Trumpista-lead GOP will ever win an election in any case, and I very much suspect that the same is true of a Republican party lead by the Cruz faction. We much-despised Center Right Republicans, scorned by Trumpista and Cruzite alike as 'the Establishment," remain the only faction (admittedly only in coalition with the Tea Party wing) which can both put together a large enough base coupled with sufficient attractiveness to independents to win.  And the centrists would have to be the senior partner; a Kasich-Cruz ticket would probably win this November. A Cruz-Kasich ticket won't.

In short, if the Republican party does have a future after this year, it's going to be on pretty much the same basis that it's done business in previous years. It's not a question of the "Establishment" hogging the power; that's simply the only basis on which victory for an American right-of-center party can be won.

It will, of course, have to be a humbled and chastened "Establishment," more attentive to the base and more zealous for the party agenda. That might happen relatively quickly. But it may take a massive defeat for Cruz before the Republican Right gives up the illusion that conservative orthodoxy is the route to victory in this particular society, or that McCain lost because the Republicans had already been in the White House for two terms and Romney because he was running against an incumbent rather than because either ran particularly bad races or were insufficiently right wing for the electorate.

Alas, if there's any lesson to be learned from this most bizarre of election years, it's that both the Trumpista populists and the Cruzite movement conservatives are fed up with being junior partners in a party led by the "Establishment." Until and unless that changes, I fear that we're going to have Democrats in the White House for a very, very long time.

And it's not going to happen in time to beat Hillary.

HT: Real Clear Politics


Popular posts from this blog

McMullin, Kasich, Hickenlooper, Huntsman, or somebody else sane in 2020!

I don't expect to be disenfranchised in 2020. I'm looking forward to Evan McMullin running against President Trump and whatever left-wing extremist the Democrats nominate. McMullin may or may not run for the Senate next year, and he may or may not run for president as an independent again next time around, but the nation can't afford to lose its most eloquent and intelligent critic of the populist takeover of the Republican party and the Executive Branch. We need the man in public life.

But interesting alternatives have developed. Ohio Gov. John Kasich has been mentioned as a potential primary challenger for Mr. Trump. I hope somebody continues the fight for the soul of my former party, even though I believe it to be a lost cause. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban is reportedly also considering a challenge to Mr. Trump. While I tend to see him at this point as somewhere to the left of where a candidate I would feel comfortable supporting might be, I would wish him well. Still, I see…

A modest proposal for a shocking innovation which is completely within the rules but which would, if adopted, revolutionize college football

I call it defense.

The idea- crazy as it may sound- is to supplement the scoring of points by your offense with an attempt to stop the other team from scoring them. Yeah, I know.  Really "out there," isn't it? But it has a history of winning not only games but championships. Modern college teams should try it more.

I'm a bit bummed about the Rose Bowl outcome but amused by the score. It seems that certain conferences aren't sure whether they're playing college football or high school basketball! I've noticed that in the scores of Sooner games. Last season the nation's college teams set a record by scoring an average of slightly more than 30 points each per game. That's a lot. Historically, that's a REAL lot.

The final score of the Rose Bowl was 54-48, though to be fair that was in double overtime. But to get there, the teams had to be tied 45-45 at the end of regulation! Last year was even worse. Southern Cal beat Penn State 52-49- in regulat…

Reflections on the present and future of my Blackhawks

As this season from hell creeps to its close at an excruciating pace and makes all of us devote more of our attention to spring training for the Cubs than we otherwise might, there are calls for the heads of Blackhawks GM Stan Bowman and even the greatest coach in Blackhawks history, Joel Quenneville.

No general manager or coach could have made Marian Hossa and Corey Crawford healthy or prevented Toews and Keith and Saad from having the worst seasons of their careers or foreseen that a series of trades most of which made perfect sense at the time wouldn't pan out. The Hawks are one season removed from the second-best regular season in their history. This will be the first time in a decade that they haven't made the playoffs.

With the exception of the Pens, maybe the Kings and (for different reasons) the Golden Knights, every other team in the NHL would kill to have won three Stanley Cups in the past decade. In fact, only the Hawks, the Pens, the Kings, the Wings, and the Brui…