Skip to main content

The heresy of Donald Trump

Citing Adlai Stevenson's quip that "as a Christian, I find Paul appealing and Peale appalling," Michael Horton- one of my favorite Reformed theologians- writes this compelling piece on the heresy that connects Donald Trump with so many people who consider themselves "evangelical" Christians: the writings of Norman Vincent Peale.

The appeal (or aPeale) of an unrepentant serial adulterer who apparently is unfamiliar with the Bible for so many conservative Christians is puzzling. Various people have tried to explain it. Usually, it's some variation of their engaging in a kind of "scorched earth" strategy in the wake of having realized that they've lost the culture wars. As if worldly triumph and glory, rather than the cross, were the hallmark and signature of the Crucified.

But therein, if Horton is right, lies the key: what Luther would have called "a theology of glory," a fatal compromise of Christ's message which permits those who claim to be His followers to instead follow a set of ideas as alien to the Gospel as rationality is to the Trump movement. Zeroing in on four key words- Creation, Sin, Christ and Leadership- Horton lays out the places where the Peale-Trump heresy departs from the Bible and the teachings of Jesus and authorizes (as one of my liberal seminary profs would have said) a departure from the teachings of Jesus to those of a different, alien Christ.

Nor is the cultural prostitution of the Gospel unique to the Trump movement or to the theology of Peale. May this essay on the Trumpian heresy illuminate that particular aspect of this present darkness, and enable those of us who follow the Crucified to confess the real cross in opposition to the chocolate one.

And yeah. Believe it or not, the crucifix in the picture is made of chocolate.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…