Skip to main content

Welcome to Armageddon

Today is Judgment Day.

Well, not the BIG Judgment Day. Probably. After all, no one knows the day or the hour. But it's certainly the day Republican and Trumpite voters will decide who get a whole passel of delegates from Ohio, Florida, Illinois and Missouri- and quite conceivably whether the Republicans have any chance whatever of beating Hillary Clinton in the Fall.

The two remaining candidates with any real chance of doing that- John Kasich and Marco Rubio- are fighting for survival, facing strong challenges from a candidate who in any other year would be treated as a joke, laughed at and forgotten early in the process. After a series of polls showing a tightening race, four recent polls have shown Donald Trump decisively defeating Marco Rubio in Rubio's home state of Florida despite an apparent victory for Rubio in early voting. Rubio must win in Florida to continue to be a serious candidate, and will probably withdraw if he loses.

In Ohio, John Kasich has rallied in recent days to take the lead over Trump in some polls. Rubio has urged his supporters in Ohio to vote for Kasich. Everyone agrees that it's going to be close. If both Kasich and Rubio lose, the race will boil down to Trump- a candidate with a 60% negative rating from voters, for whom nearly as many Republicans say that they would not vote in November as have voted for him in the primaries- and Ted Cruz, the quirky, much-disliked poster child for shutting down the government who has yet to repudiate a religious background which advocates making Leviticus American civil law and who has been proclaimed by his preacher-father to be one of God's anointed End-Time "kings" mandated, according to a bizarre interpretation of a passage from Proverbs, to re-distribute the world's wealth.

Cruz is running as a "Constitutional conservative." Comparatively few conservatives seem to have seen the irony.

Even a wounded- perhaps even an indicted- Hillary Clinton would probably have little trouble defeating either of the Republican party's strange pair of front-runners. Rubio's chances in Florida are improved by the fact that it has a closed primary, in which only already-registered Republicans can vote. This should minimize the number of generally non-voting Trump supporters who can simply show up at the polls, do their damage, and disappear again. Ohio is a "semi-open" primary in which only registered Republicans can vote, but in which independents and Democrats can change their registration fo Republican on Election Day,

Prayers are in order. If both Kasich and Rubio lose, the only remaining hope of beating Hillary Clinton in the Fall will be that nobody reaches the 1,237 delegates needed for the nomination at Cleveland on July 18-21. In that case, there's a good possibility that the convention might select a "dark horse-" a candidate who didn't run this year, but behind whom a majority of the delegates can line up. Trump supporters, who apparently feel that contrary to the rules their candidate is entitled to the nomination if he merely gets a plurality of the votes, would probably revolt, but it's hard to see anything they could do that would hurt the Republican party as much as nominating Trump would.

The likelihood of such an outcome could dramatically increase tonight, I expect Trump to have little trouble winning the primary in Illinois though I have a hunch Cruz might win in Missouri. But most of them are selected in both states by Congressional district. Both Ohio and Florida are "winner take all" states. A sweep of the four would help Trump a great deal. But a split- say, Trump winning Florida and Illinois, Kasich winning Ohio, and Cruz winning Missouri- would leave Trump still far off the pace he would need to get a majority at Cleveland. If Trump wins only one state, his prospects will be even darker. And as of tonight, a majority of delegates to the convention will have been selected.

At the moment, Trump has 469 of the 1,237 delegates he would need, to 370 for Cruz, 163 for Rubio, and 63 for Kasich. Pending tonight's vote, an open convention such as the GOP had in 1976 and 1952 (and used to be the norm before the advent of the primary system) actually seems to me a little more likely than a Trump nomination.

In that case, it would be possible that the convention might turn to Cruz. But I doubt it. I have a feeling it could be the most entertaining convention of my lifetime. The ideal result might be the emergence of a new, fresh, carefully-selected face who would contrast with Hillary's tired and all-foo-familiar one in a way which would bode well for an enjoyable Election Night for Republicans and a good four years for the nation.

In the meantime, I'm still rooting for an upset tonight in Florida and a renewed burst of momentum for Rubio. Failing that, John Kasich would be the guy I'd root for. Better Cruz than Trump- but better somebody new, emerging from an open convention, than either.


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…