Skip to main content

You, know I think I get it

You know, after lo these many, weary months of trying to reason with Trump supporters, I think something I've always known in theory has finally sunk in.

They are immune to reason. They live in a different dimension than we do. They are immune to reality.

In their reality, a candidate who receives a third of the votes in the primaries is strongly opposed by roughly two-thirds of the party's membership and fails to achieve a majority of the delegates in a series of fair primary contests is nevertheless entitled to the nomination. But only if it's their candidate.

In their reality, if a candidate has proven to be "the people's choice" (which Trump, of course, has not), nobody has a right to oppose him. As long as it's their candidate.

In their reality, a candidate who lies almost as often as he breathes, inherited his wealth, has failed repeatedly in business, knows practically nothing about the issues or even the most basic facts of American government taught in Civics class in high school, knows everything, is always right, can do no wrong, and is the ideal president of the United States. As long as he's their candidate.

In their world, manners don't matter, basic civility is to be demanded only from their candidates' opponents and never from him, and their candidate is free to say anything he wants, no matter how outrageous, and somehow reality becomes what he says it is.

One cannot reason with them because they are immune to reason. In their dimension, different rules apply.

In their dimension, if the polls say that their candidate is going to lose, the polls are rigged. In their dimension, if what their candidate says doesn't correspond to the facts, the facts must be wrong.

So the obvious question arises of what they're going to do and say when- not if- Donald Trump, having been nominated, goes down to a historic, landslide defeat at the hands of a woman who to all appearances ought to be in jail rather than in the Whtie House. Three approaches will probably predominate.

The first one of The Donald's own favorites: that somebody else is responsible for their own blunder (this includes the notion that nobody has a right to disagree with them, and therefore that no Republican has the right to vote for somebody else or even to stay home.

The second is that the election their guy lost by a landslide was somehow stolen.

And the third is that reality is wrong, and President Trump really won,


Popular posts from this blog

Jan Chamberlain's rhetoric is too strong. But the stand she has taken is right.

I do not share the religion of Jan Chamberlain. I don't even pray to the same god. But I can't help but admire the integrity of the woman who quit the Mormon Tabernacle Choir rather than sing at Donald Trump's inauguration.

Ms. Chamberlain, like me, voted for Evan McMullin in November. Like me, she holds no brief for Hillary Clinton or her agenda. But she cannot, as she put it, "throw roses at Hitler."

As I've said before, comparing Trump to Hitler strikes me as harsh. I believe that Trump is a power-hungry narcissist who exhibits disturbing signs of psychopathy, like Hitler. Like Hitler, he has stigmatized  defenseless minorities- Muslims and undocumented aliens, rather than Jews- and made them scapegoats for the nation's troubles. Like Hitler, he has ridden a wave of irrational hatred and emotion to power. Like Hitler's, his agenda foreshadows disaster for the nation he has been chosen to lead.

But he's not going to set up death camps for Musli…

Neither Evan McMullin nor his movement are going away

Evan McMullin has devoted most of his post-college life- even to the point of foregoing marriage and a family- to fighting ISIS and al Qaeda and our nation's deadliest enemies as a clandestine officer for the CIA. He has done so at the risk of his life.

He has seen authoritarianism in action close-up. One of his main jobs overseas was to locate and facilitate the elimination of jihadist warlords. Evan McMullin knows authoritarians.

And when he looks at Donald Trump, what he sees is an authoritarian like the ones he fought overseas. He knows Donald Trump. After leaving the CIA he served as policy director for the Republican majority in the United States House of Representatives. He tells about his first encounter with The Donald in that role in this opinion piece he wrote for today's New York Times.

In fact, when Mitt Romney and Tom Coburn and all the others who were recruited to run as a conservative third-party candidate against Trump and Hillary Clinton backed out,  McMulli…

Huzzah! Once again, 45 does something majorly right!

First. he appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and now 45 has- at long last- initiated a sensible space policy, with a plan to promote a "rapid and affordable" return to the moon carried out by private enterprise by 2020.  Afterward, it will be onward to Mars and beyond.

This is a great idea for three reasons. First, private enterprise is the future of space exploration, and as far as I know we will be the first spacefaring nation to put most of its eggs in that basket. Second, it's nice to have eggs! Since the Obama administration canceled the Constellation program to develop the Ares booster and the Orion crew vehicle (though it subsequently reinstated the Orion part of the program), the United States has been twiddling its thumbs while China has taken great leaps toward the moon and other countries- including Russia, India, and Japan- have to various degrees intensified their own space programs. It would be both tragic and foolhardy for the nation which first…